Difference between revisions of "User:Shawndouglas/sandbox/sublevel11"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(76 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| type      = notice
| type      = notice
| style    = width: 960px;
| style    = width: 960px;
| text      = This is sublevel2 of my sandbox, where I play with features and test MediaWiki code. If you wish to leave a comment for me, please see [[User_talk:Shawndouglas|my discussion page]] instead.<p></p>
| text      = This is sublevel11 of my sandbox, where I play with features and test MediaWiki code. If you wish to leave a comment for me, please see [[User_talk:Shawndouglas|my discussion page]] instead.<p></p>
}}
}}


==Sandbox begins below==
==Sandbox begins below==
In their 1974 multi-volume series ''Systematic Materials Analysis'', Richardson and Peterson say the following about the then state of materials testing<ref>{{Cite book |last=Richardson |first=James H. |last2=Peterson |first2=Ronald V. |date= |year=1974 |title=Systematic Materials Analysis, Part 1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BNocpYI8gJkC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Systematic+Materials+analysis&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjB1OeQx-aAAxWnmmoFHSV2BSsQ6AF6BAgMEAI#v=onepage&q=Systematic%20Materials%20analysis&f=false |chapter=Preface |series=Materials science series |publisher=Academic Press |place=New York |page=xiii |isbn=978-0-12-587801-2 |doi=10.1016/B978-0-12-587801-2.X5001-0}}</ref>:


==6. Reporting==
<blockquote>It is both exciting and dismaying to observe the parade of new and refined instrumental methods available for the analysis of materials—exciting because these instruments provide opportunities for faster and more reliable answers to material analysis problems, dismaying because one is hard pressed to evaluate these various instruments for a given task. Materials analysis often involves the complete characterization of a material, including structural and textural analyses in addition to chemical analysis ... These volumes not only comprise a brief, comprehensive reference for the materials analyst but also provides a source of information for the engineer or researcher who must select the appropriate instrument for his immediate needs.</blockquote>
{|
 
| STYLE="vertical-align:top;"|
==References==
{| class="wikitable collapsible" border="1" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0"
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}
|-
  ! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; padding-left:20px; padding-top:10px; padding-bottom:10px;"|
|-
  ! style="color:brown; background-color:#ffffee; width:500px;"| Regulation, Specification, or Guidance
  ! style="color:brown; background-color:#ffffee; width:700px;"| Requirement
|-
  | style="padding:5px; width:500px;" |[https://www.astm.org/Standards/E1578.htm ASTM E1578-18 C-6-1]
  | style="background-color:white;" |The system shall be able to store files in an electronic format and link them to standards, reagents, and samples tested.
|-
  | style="padding:5px; width:500px;" |[https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/erln_lab_requirements.pdf EPA ERLN Laboratory Requirements 3.4]<br />[https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/erln_lab_requirements.pdf EPA ERLN Laboratory Requirements 4.1.4]<br />[https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/erln_lab_requirements.pdf EPA ERLN Laboratory Requirements 4.12–15]
  | style="background-color:white;" |The system shall be able to export data in a computer-readable (importable into a relational database) format—such as an unformatted spreadsheet, comma-separated value (CSV) file, or extensible markup language (XML) file—as well as PDF format, for reporting purposes.
|-
  | style="padding:5px; width:500px;" |[https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/42/493.1291 42 CFR Part 493.1291 (g) and (h)]<br />[https://www.astm.org/Standards/E1578.htm ASTM E1578-18 C-6-2]<br />[https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/erln_lab_requirements.pdf EPA ERLN Laboratory Requirements 4.11.4]<br />[https://www.epa.gov/quality/guidance-quality-assurance-project-plans-epa-qag-5 EPA QA/G-5 2.4.2]
  | style="background-color:white;" |The system shall alert users in advance to cases when the sample may be out-of-specification or may not meet expected turnaround time requirements.
|-
  | style="padding:5px; width:500px;" |[http://www.abft.org/files/ABFT_LAP_Standards_May_31_2013.pdf ABFT Accreditation Manual Sec. G-2]
  | style="background-color:white;" |The system shall allow an authorized individual to report final results in a semi-quantitative manner (e.g., "less than X mg/L") when doing so would provide relevant information to the report recipient.
|-
|}
|}

Latest revision as of 17:40, 20 September 2023

Sandbox begins below

In their 1974 multi-volume series Systematic Materials Analysis, Richardson and Peterson say the following about the then state of materials testing[1]:

It is both exciting and dismaying to observe the parade of new and refined instrumental methods available for the analysis of materials—exciting because these instruments provide opportunities for faster and more reliable answers to material analysis problems, dismaying because one is hard pressed to evaluate these various instruments for a given task. Materials analysis often involves the complete characterization of a material, including structural and textural analyses in addition to chemical analysis ... These volumes not only comprise a brief, comprehensive reference for the materials analyst but also provides a source of information for the engineer or researcher who must select the appropriate instrument for his immediate needs.

References