Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"
Shawndouglas (talk | contribs) (Updated article of the week text) |
Shawndouglas (talk | contribs) (Updated article of the week text) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File: | <div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig2 Matielo Publications2018 6-4.png|240px]]</div> | ||
'''"[[Journal: | '''"[[Journal:A bibliometric analysis of Cannabis publications: Six decades of research and a gap on studies with the plant|A bibliometric analysis of ''Cannabis'' publications: Six decades of research and a gap on studies with the plant]]"''' | ||
In this study we performed a bibliometric analysis focusing on the general patterns of scientific publications about ''[[wikipedia:Cannabis|Cannabis]]'', revealing their trends and limitations. Publications related to ''Cannabis'', released from 1960 to 2017, were retrieved from the Scopus database using six search terms. The search term “[[wikipedia:Genetics|Genetics]]” returned 53.4% of publications, while “forensic genetics” and “[[wikipedia:Traceability|traceability]]” represented 2.3% and 0.1% of the publications, respectively. However, 43.1% of the studies were not directly related to ''Cannabis'' and, in some cases, ''Cannabis'' was just used as an example in the text. A significant increase in publications was observed after 2001, with most of the publications coming from Europe, followed by North America. Although the term "''Cannabis''" was found in the title, abstract, or keywords of 1284 publications, we detected a historical gap in studies on the plant. ('''[[Journal:A bibliometric analysis of Cannabis publications: Six decades of research and a gap on studies with the plant|Full article...]]''')<br /> | |||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
''Recently featured'': | ''Recently featured'': | ||
: ▪ [[Journal:Leaner and greener analysis of cannabinoids|Leaner and greener analysis of cannabinoids]] | |||
: ▪ [[Journal:Laboratory information management software for engineered mini-protein therapeutic workflow|Laboratory information management software for engineered mini-protein therapeutic workflow]] | : ▪ [[Journal:Laboratory information management software for engineered mini-protein therapeutic workflow|Laboratory information management software for engineered mini-protein therapeutic workflow]] | ||
: ▪ [[Journal:Defending our public biological databases as a global critical infrastructure|Defending our public biological databases as a global critical infrastructure]] | : ▪ [[Journal:Defending our public biological databases as a global critical infrastructure|Defending our public biological databases as a global critical infrastructure]] | ||
Revision as of 15:37, 12 August 2019
In this study we performed a bibliometric analysis focusing on the general patterns of scientific publications about Cannabis, revealing their trends and limitations. Publications related to Cannabis, released from 1960 to 2017, were retrieved from the Scopus database using six search terms. The search term “Genetics” returned 53.4% of publications, while “forensic genetics” and “traceability” represented 2.3% and 0.1% of the publications, respectively. However, 43.1% of the studies were not directly related to Cannabis and, in some cases, Cannabis was just used as an example in the text. A significant increase in publications was observed after 2001, with most of the publications coming from Europe, followed by North America. Although the term "Cannabis" was found in the title, abstract, or keywords of 1284 publications, we detected a historical gap in studies on the plant. (Full article...)
Recently featured: