Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text.)
(Updated article of the week text)
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig3 Johnson JofCannRes23 5.png|240px]]</div>
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig1 Karaattuthazhathu NatJLabMed23 12-2.png|260px]]</div>
'''"[[Journal:Potency and safety analysis of hemp-derived delta-9 products: The hemp vs. cannabis demarcation problem|Potency and safety analysis of hemp-derived delta-9 products: The hemp vs. cannabis demarcation problem]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:Sigma metrics as a valuable tool for effective analytical performance and quality control planning in the clinical laboratory: A retrospective study|Sigma metrics as a valuable tool for effective analytical performance and quality control planning in the clinical laboratory: A retrospective study]]"'''


[[Hemp]]-derived [[Tetrahydrocannabinol|delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol]] (Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC) products are freely available for sale across much of the USA, but the federal legislation allowing their sale places only minimal requirements on companies. Products must contain no more than 0.3% Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC by dry weight, but no limit is placed on overall dosage, and there is no requirement that products derived from hemp-based Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC be tested. However, some states—such as Colorado—specifically prohibit products created by “chemically modifying” a natural hemp component. Fifty-three hemp-derived Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC products were ordered and submitted to InfiniteCAL [[laboratory]] for analysis ... ('''[[Journal:Potency and safety analysis of hemp-derived delta-9 products: The hemp vs. cannabis demarcation problem|Full article...]]''')<br />
For the release of precise and accurate reports of [[Medical test|routine tests]], its necessary to follow a proper [[quality management system]] (QMS) in the [[clinical laboratory]]. As one of the most popular QMS tools for process improvement, Six Sigma techniques and tools have been accepted widely in the [[laboratory]] testing process. Six Sigma gives an objective assessment of analytical methods and instrumentation, measuring the outcome of a process on a scale of 0 to 6. Poor outcomes are measured in terms of defects per million opportunities (DPMO). To do the performance assessment of each clinical laboratory [[analyte]] by Six Sigma analysis and to plan and chart out a better, customized [[quality control]] (QC) plan for each analyte, according to its own sigma value ... ('''[[Journal:Sigma metrics as a valuable tool for effective analytical performance and quality control planning in the clinical laboratory: A retrospective study|Full article...]]''')<br />
''Recently featured'':
''Recently featured'':
{{flowlist |
{{flowlist |
* [[Journal:The NOMAD Artificial Intelligence Toolkit: Turning materials science data into knowledge and understanding|The NOMAD Artificial Intelligence Toolkit: Turning materials science data into knowledge and understanding]]
* [[Journal:Why do we need food systems informatics? Introduction to this special collection on smart and connected regional food systems|Why do we need food systems informatics? Introduction to this special collection on smart and connected regional food systems]]
* [[Journal:Quality control in the clinical biochemistry laboratory: A glance|Quality control in the clinical biochemistry laboratory: A glance]]
* [[Journal:Data management challenges for artificial intelligence in plant and agricultural research|Data management challenges for artificial intelligence in plant and agricultural research]]
* [[Journal:Shared metadata for data-centric materials science|Shared metadata for data-centric materials science]]
* [[Journal:A blockchain-driven IoT-based food quality traceability system for dairy products using a deep learning model|A blockchain-driven IoT-based food quality traceability system for dairy products using a deep learning model]]
}}
}}

Revision as of 16:52, 29 April 2024

Fig1 Karaattuthazhathu NatJLabMed23 12-2.png

"Sigma metrics as a valuable tool for effective analytical performance and quality control planning in the clinical laboratory: A retrospective study"

For the release of precise and accurate reports of routine tests, its necessary to follow a proper quality management system (QMS) in the clinical laboratory. As one of the most popular QMS tools for process improvement, Six Sigma techniques and tools have been accepted widely in the laboratory testing process. Six Sigma gives an objective assessment of analytical methods and instrumentation, measuring the outcome of a process on a scale of 0 to 6. Poor outcomes are measured in terms of defects per million opportunities (DPMO). To do the performance assessment of each clinical laboratory analyte by Six Sigma analysis and to plan and chart out a better, customized quality control (QC) plan for each analyte, according to its own sigma value ... (Full article...)
Recently featured: