Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text)
(Updated article of the week text)
(48 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig1 daSilva Sustain22 14-22.png|240px]]</div>
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig1 Scroggie DigDisc2023 2.gif|240px]]</div>
'''"[[Journal:Construction of control charts to help in the stability and reliability of results in an accredited water quality control laboratory|Construction of control charts to help in the stability and reliability of results in an accredited water quality control laboratory]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:GitHub as an open electronic laboratory notebook for real-time sharing of knowledge and collaboration|GitHub as an open electronic laboratory notebook for real-time sharing of knowledge and collaboration]]"'''


Overall, [[laboratory]] water [[Quality (business)|quality]] analysis must have stability in their results, especially in laboratories accredited by [[ISO/IEC 17025]]. Accredited parameters should be strictly reliable. Using [[control chart]]s to ascertain divergences between results is thus very useful. The present work applied a methodology of [[Data analysis|analysis of results]] through control charts to accurately monitor the results for a wastewater treatment plant. The parameters analyzed were pH, biological oxygen demand for five days (BOD<sub>5</sub>), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solids (TSS), and total phosphorus (TP). The stability of the results was analyzed from the control charts and 30 analyses performed in the last 12 months. From the results, it was possible to observe whether the results were stable, according to the rehabilitation factor, which cannot exceed WN = 1.00, and the efficiency of removal of pollutants, which remained above 70% for all parameters ... ('''[[Journal:Construction of control charts to help in the stability and reliability of results in an accredited water quality control laboratory|Full article...]]''')<br />
[[Electronic laboratory notebook]]s (ELNs) have expanded the utility of the paper [[laboratory notebook]] beyond that of a simple record keeping tool. Open ELNs offer additional benefits to the scientific community, including increased transparency, reproducibility, and [[Data integrity|integrity]]. A key element underpinning these benefits is facile and expedient knowledge sharing which aids communication and collaboration. In previous projects, we have used [[LabTrove]] and [[LabArchives, LLC|LabArchives]] as open ELNs, in partnership with GitHub (an open-source web-based platform originally developed for collaborative coding) for communication and discussion. Here we present our personal experiences using GitHub as the central platform for many aspects of the scientific process ... ('''[[Journal:GitHub as an open electronic laboratory notebook for real-time sharing of knowledge and collaboration|Full article...]]''')<br />
''Recently featured'':
''Recently featured'':
{{flowlist |
{{flowlist |
* [[Journal:Application of informatics in cancer research and clinical practice: Opportunities and challenges|Application of informatics in cancer research and clinical practice: Opportunities and challenges]]
* [[Journal:SODAR: Managing multiomics study data and metadata|SODAR: Managing multiomics study data and metadata]]
* [[Journal:Recommendations for achieving interoperable and shareable medical data in the USA|Recommendations for achieving interoperable and shareable medical data in the USA]]
* [[Journal:Benefits of information technology in healthcare: Artificial intelligence, internet of things, and personal health records|Benefits of information technology in healthcare: Artificial intelligence, internet of things, and personal health records]]
* [[Journal:Can a byte improve our bite? An analysis of digital twins in the food industry|Can a byte improve our bite? An analysis of digital twins in the food industry]]
* [[Journal:A quality assurance discrimination tool for the evaluation of satellite laboratory practice excellence in the context of European regulatory meat inspection for Trichinella spp.|A quality assurance discrimination tool for the evaluation of satellite laboratory practice excellence in the context of European regulatory meat inspection for ''Trichinella spp.'']]
}}
}}

Revision as of 16:20, 26 March 2024

Fig1 Scroggie DigDisc2023 2.gif

"GitHub as an open electronic laboratory notebook for real-time sharing of knowledge and collaboration"

Electronic laboratory notebooks (ELNs) have expanded the utility of the paper laboratory notebook beyond that of a simple record keeping tool. Open ELNs offer additional benefits to the scientific community, including increased transparency, reproducibility, and integrity. A key element underpinning these benefits is facile and expedient knowledge sharing which aids communication and collaboration. In previous projects, we have used LabTrove and LabArchives as open ELNs, in partnership with GitHub (an open-source web-based platform originally developed for collaborative coding) for communication and discussion. Here we present our personal experiences using GitHub as the central platform for many aspects of the scientific process ... (Full article...)
Recently featured: