Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text)
(Updated article of the week text)
(23 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Tab2 Haugsbakken NordicJOfSciTechStud2018 6-1.png|240px]]</div>
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig1 Wang BMCMedInfoDecMak2019 19-1.png|240px]]</div>
'''"[[Journal:What is the meaning of sharing: Informing, being informed or information overload?|What is the meaning of sharing: Informing, being informed or information overload?]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:Design and evaluation of a LIS-based autoverification system for coagulation assays in a core clinical laboratory|Design and evaluation of a LIS-based autoverification system for coagulation assays in a core clinical laboratory]]"'''


In recent years, several Norwegian public organizations have introduced enterprise social media platforms (ESMPs). The rationale for their implementation pertains to a goal of improving internal communications and work processes in organizational life. Such objectives can be attained on the condition that employees adopt the platform and embrace the practice of sharing. Although sharing work on ESMPs can bring benefits, making sense of the practice of sharing constitutes a challenge. In this regard, the paper performs an analysis on a case whereby an ESMP was introduced in a Norwegian public organization. The analytical focus is on the challenges and experiences of making sense of the practice of sharing. The research results show that users faced challenges in making sense of sharing.  ('''[[Journal:What is the meaning of sharing: Informing, being informed or information overload?|Full article...]]''')<br />
n autoverification system for coagulation consists of a series of rules that allows normal data to be released without manual verification. With new advances in [[medical informatics]], the [[laboratory information system]] (LIS) has growing potential for the use of autoverification, allowing rapid and accurate verification of [[clinical laboratory]] tests. The purpose of the study is to develop and evaluate a LIS-based autoverification system for validation and efficiency.
 
Autoverification decision rules—including quality control, analytical error flag, critical value, limited range check, delta check, and logical check rules, as well as patient’s historical information—were integrated into the LIS. Autoverification limit ranges was constructed based on 5% and 95% percentiles. The four most commonly used coagulation assays—prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT), and fibrinogen (FBG)—were followed by the autoverification protocols. ('''[[Journal:Design and evaluation of a LIS-based autoverification system for coagulation assays in a core clinical laboratory|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
<br />
''Recently featured'':
''Recently featured'':
: ▪ [[Journal:Cyberbiosecurity: An emerging new discipline to help safeguard the bioeconomy|Cyberbiosecurity: An emerging new discipline to help safeguard the bioeconomy]]
: ▪ [[Journal:CyberMaster: An expert system to guide the development of cybersecurity curricula|CyberMaster: An expert system to guide the development of cybersecurity curricula]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Cyberbiosecurity: A new perspective on protecting U.S. food and agricultural system|Cyberbiosecurity: A new perspective on protecting U.S. food and agricultural system]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Costs of mandatory cannabis testing in California|Costs of mandatory cannabis testing in California]]
: ▪ [[Journal:DAQUA-MASS: An ISO 8000-61-based data quality management methodology for sensor data|DAQUA-MASS: An ISO 8000-61-based data quality management methodology for sensor data]]
: ▪ [[Journal:An integrated data analytics platform|An integrated data analytics platform]]

Revision as of 15:52, 11 November 2019

Fig1 Wang BMCMedInfoDecMak2019 19-1.png

"Design and evaluation of a LIS-based autoverification system for coagulation assays in a core clinical laboratory"

n autoverification system for coagulation consists of a series of rules that allows normal data to be released without manual verification. With new advances in medical informatics, the laboratory information system (LIS) has growing potential for the use of autoverification, allowing rapid and accurate verification of clinical laboratory tests. The purpose of the study is to develop and evaluate a LIS-based autoverification system for validation and efficiency.

Autoverification decision rules—including quality control, analytical error flag, critical value, limited range check, delta check, and logical check rules, as well as patient’s historical information—were integrated into the LIS. Autoverification limit ranges was constructed based on 5% and 95% percentiles. The four most commonly used coagulation assays—prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT), and fibrinogen (FBG)—were followed by the autoverification protocols. (Full article...)

Recently featured:

CyberMaster: An expert system to guide the development of cybersecurity curricula
Costs of mandatory cannabis testing in California
An integrated data analytics platform