Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text.)
(Updated article of the week text)
(47 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig1 Malykh JofHealthEng2018 2018.png|240px]]</div>
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig1 Wang BMCMedInfoDecMak2019 19-1.png|240px]]</div>
'''"[[Journal:Approaches to medical decision-making based on big clinical data|Approaches to medical decision-making based on big clinical data]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:Design and evaluation of a LIS-based autoverification system for coagulation assays in a core clinical laboratory|Design and evaluation of a LIS-based autoverification system for coagulation assays in a core clinical laboratory]]"'''


The paper discusses different approaches to building a [[clinical decision support system]] based on big data. The authors sought to abstain from any data reduction and apply universal teaching and big data processing methods independent of disease classification standards. The paper assesses and compares the accuracy of recommendations among three options: case-based reasoning, simple single-layer neural network, and probabilistic neural network. Further, the paper substantiates the assumption regarding the most efficient approach to solving the specified problem. ('''[[Journal:Approaches to medical decision-making based on big clinical data|Full article...]]''')<br />
n autoverification system for coagulation consists of a series of rules that allows normal data to be released without manual verification. With new advances in [[medical informatics]], the [[laboratory information system]] (LIS) has growing potential for the use of autoverification, allowing rapid and accurate verification of [[clinical laboratory]] tests. The purpose of the study is to develop and evaluate a LIS-based autoverification system for validation and efficiency.
 
Autoverification decision rules—including quality control, analytical error flag, critical value, limited range check, delta check, and logical check rules, as well as patient’s historical information—were integrated into the LIS. Autoverification limit ranges was constructed based on 5% and 95% percentiles. The four most commonly used coagulation assays—prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT), and fibrinogen (FBG)—were followed by the autoverification protocols. ('''[[Journal:Design and evaluation of a LIS-based autoverification system for coagulation assays in a core clinical laboratory|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
<br />
''Recently featured'':
''Recently featured'':
: ▪ [[Journal:A new numerical method for processing longitudinal data: Clinical applications|A new numerical method for processing longitudinal data: Clinical applications]]
: ▪ [[Journal:CyberMaster: An expert system to guide the development of cybersecurity curricula|CyberMaster: An expert system to guide the development of cybersecurity curricula]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Big data management for healthcare systems: Architecture, requirements, and implementation|Big data management for healthcare systems: Architecture, requirements, and implementation]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Costs of mandatory cannabis testing in California|Costs of mandatory cannabis testing in California]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Support Your Data: A research data management guide for researchers|Support Your Data: A research data management guide for researchers]]
: ▪ [[Journal:An integrated data analytics platform|An integrated data analytics platform]]

Revision as of 15:52, 11 November 2019

Fig1 Wang BMCMedInfoDecMak2019 19-1.png

"Design and evaluation of a LIS-based autoverification system for coagulation assays in a core clinical laboratory"

n autoverification system for coagulation consists of a series of rules that allows normal data to be released without manual verification. With new advances in medical informatics, the laboratory information system (LIS) has growing potential for the use of autoverification, allowing rapid and accurate verification of clinical laboratory tests. The purpose of the study is to develop and evaluate a LIS-based autoverification system for validation and efficiency.

Autoverification decision rules—including quality control, analytical error flag, critical value, limited range check, delta check, and logical check rules, as well as patient’s historical information—were integrated into the LIS. Autoverification limit ranges was constructed based on 5% and 95% percentiles. The four most commonly used coagulation assays—prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT), and fibrinogen (FBG)—were followed by the autoverification protocols. (Full article...)

Recently featured:

CyberMaster: An expert system to guide the development of cybersecurity curricula
Costs of mandatory cannabis testing in California
An integrated data analytics platform