Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text.)
(Updated article of the week text)
(27 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig1 Bardyn JofESciLib2018 7-2.jpg|240px]]</div>
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig4 Ebnehoseini OAccessMacJofMedSci2019 7-9.png|240px]]</div>
'''"[[Journal:Health sciences libraries advancing collaborative clinical research data management in universities|Health sciences libraries advancing collaborative clinical research data management in universities]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:Determining the hospital information system (HIS) success rate: Development of a new instrument and case study|Determining the hospital information system (HIS) success rate: Development of a new instrument and case study]]"'''


Medical libraries need to actively review their service models and explore partnerships with other campus entities to provide better-coordinated clinical research management services to faculty and researchers. TRAIL (Translational Research and Information Lab), a five-partner initiative at the University of Washington (UW), explores how best to leverage existing expertise and space to deliver clinical research [[Information management|data management]] (CRDM) services and emerging technology support to clinical researchers at UW and collaborating institutions in the Pacific Northwest. The initiative offers 14 services and a technology-enhanced innovation lab located in the Health Sciences Library (HSL) to support the University of Washington clinical and research enterprise. Sharing of staff and resources merges library and non-library workflows, better coordinating data and innovation services to clinical researchers. Librarians have adopted new roles in CRDM, such as providing user support and training for UW’s Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) instance. ('''[[Journal:Health sciences libraries advancing collaborative clinical research data management in universities|Full article...]]''')<br />
A [[hospital information system]] (HIS) is a type of health information system which is widely used in clinical settings. Determining the success rate of a HIS is an ongoing area of research since its implications are of interest for researchers, physicians, and managers. In the present study, we develop a novel instrument to measure HIS success rate based on users’ viewpoints in a teaching [[hospital]]. The study was conducted in Ibn-e Sina and Dr. Hejazi Psychiatry Hospital and education center in Mashhad, Iran. The instrument for data collection was a self-administered structured questionnaire based on the information systems success model (ISSM), covering seven dimensions, which includes system quality, [[information]] quality, service quality, system use, usefulness, satisfaction, and net benefits. The verification of content validity was carried out by an expert panel. The internal consistency of dimensions was measured by Cronbach’s alpha. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the significance of associations between dimensions. The HIS success rate on users’ viewpoints was determined. ('''[[Journal:Determining the hospital information system (HIS) success rate: Development of a new instrument and case study|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
<br />
''Recently featured'':
''Recently featured'':
: ▪ [[Journal:Privacy preservation techniques in big data analytics: A survey|Privacy preservation techniques in big data analytics: A survey]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Smart information systems in cybersecurity: An ethical analysis|Smart information systems in cybersecurity: An ethical analysis]]
: ▪ [[Journal:The development and application of bioinformatics core competencies to improve bioinformatics training and education|The development and application of bioinformatics core competencies to improve bioinformatics training and education]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Chemometric analysis of cannabinoids: Chemotaxonomy and domestication syndrome|Chemometric analysis of cannabinoids: Chemotaxonomy and domestication syndrome]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Approaches to medical decision-making based on big clinical data|Approaches to medical decision-making based on big clinical data]]
: ▪ [[Journal:National and transnational security implications of asymmetric access to and use of biological data|National and transnational security implications of asymmetric access to and use of biological data]]

Revision as of 16:04, 15 July 2019

Fig4 Ebnehoseini OAccessMacJofMedSci2019 7-9.png

"Determining the hospital information system (HIS) success rate: Development of a new instrument and case study"

A hospital information system (HIS) is a type of health information system which is widely used in clinical settings. Determining the success rate of a HIS is an ongoing area of research since its implications are of interest for researchers, physicians, and managers. In the present study, we develop a novel instrument to measure HIS success rate based on users’ viewpoints in a teaching hospital. The study was conducted in Ibn-e Sina and Dr. Hejazi Psychiatry Hospital and education center in Mashhad, Iran. The instrument for data collection was a self-administered structured questionnaire based on the information systems success model (ISSM), covering seven dimensions, which includes system quality, information quality, service quality, system use, usefulness, satisfaction, and net benefits. The verification of content validity was carried out by an expert panel. The internal consistency of dimensions was measured by Cronbach’s alpha. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the significance of associations between dimensions. The HIS success rate on users’ viewpoints was determined. (Full article...)

Recently featured:

Smart information systems in cybersecurity: An ethical analysis
Chemometric analysis of cannabinoids: Chemotaxonomy and domestication syndrome
National and transnational security implications of asymmetric access to and use of biological data