Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text.)
(Updated article of the week text)
(33 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''"[[Journal:Support Your Data: A research data management guide for researchers|Support Your Data: A research data management guide for researchers]]"'''
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig4 Ebnehoseini OAccessMacJofMedSci2019 7-9.png|240px]]</div>
'''"[[Journal:Determining the hospital information system (HIS) success rate: Development of a new instrument and case study|Determining the hospital information system (HIS) success rate: Development of a new instrument and case study]]"'''


Researchers are faced with rapidly evolving expectations about how they should manage and share their data, code, and other [[research]] materials. To help them meet these expectations and generally manage and share their data more effectively, we are developing a suite of tools which we are currently referring to as "Support Your Data." These tools— which include a rubric designed to enable researchers to self-assess their current [[Information management|data management]] practices and a series of short guides which provide actionable [[information]] about how to advance practices as necessary or desired—are intended to be easily customizable to meet the needs of researchers working in a variety of institutional and disciplinary contexts. ('''[[Journal:Support Your Data: A research data management guide for researchers|Full article...]]''')<br />
A [[hospital information system]] (HIS) is a type of health information system which is widely used in clinical settings. Determining the success rate of a HIS is an ongoing area of research since its implications are of interest for researchers, physicians, and managers. In the present study, we develop a novel instrument to measure HIS success rate based on users’ viewpoints in a teaching [[hospital]]. The study was conducted in Ibn-e Sina and Dr. Hejazi Psychiatry Hospital and education center in Mashhad, Iran. The instrument for data collection was a self-administered structured questionnaire based on the information systems success model (ISSM), covering seven dimensions, which includes system quality, [[information]] quality, service quality, system use, usefulness, satisfaction, and net benefits. The verification of content validity was carried out by an expert panel. The internal consistency of dimensions was measured by Cronbach’s alpha. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the significance of associations between dimensions. The HIS success rate on users’ viewpoints was determined. ('''[[Journal:Determining the hospital information system (HIS) success rate: Development of a new instrument and case study|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
<br />
''Recently featured'':
''Recently featured'':
: ▪ [[Journal:CÆLIS: Software for assimilation, management, and processing data of an atmospheric measurement network|CÆLIS: Software for assimilation, management, and processing data of an atmospheric measurement network]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Smart information systems in cybersecurity: An ethical analysis|Smart information systems in cybersecurity: An ethical analysis]]
: ▪ [[Journal:How could the ethical management of health data in the medical field inform police use of DNA?|How could the ethical management of health data in the medical field inform police use of DNA?]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Chemometric analysis of cannabinoids: Chemotaxonomy and domestication syndrome|Chemometric analysis of cannabinoids: Chemotaxonomy and domestication syndrome]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Big data in the era of health information exchanges: Challenges and opportunities for public health|Big data in the era of health information exchanges: Challenges and opportunities for public health]]
: ▪ [[Journal:National and transnational security implications of asymmetric access to and use of biological data|National and transnational security implications of asymmetric access to and use of biological data]]

Revision as of 16:04, 15 July 2019

Fig4 Ebnehoseini OAccessMacJofMedSci2019 7-9.png

"Determining the hospital information system (HIS) success rate: Development of a new instrument and case study"

A hospital information system (HIS) is a type of health information system which is widely used in clinical settings. Determining the success rate of a HIS is an ongoing area of research since its implications are of interest for researchers, physicians, and managers. In the present study, we develop a novel instrument to measure HIS success rate based on users’ viewpoints in a teaching hospital. The study was conducted in Ibn-e Sina and Dr. Hejazi Psychiatry Hospital and education center in Mashhad, Iran. The instrument for data collection was a self-administered structured questionnaire based on the information systems success model (ISSM), covering seven dimensions, which includes system quality, information quality, service quality, system use, usefulness, satisfaction, and net benefits. The verification of content validity was carried out by an expert panel. The internal consistency of dimensions was measured by Cronbach’s alpha. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the significance of associations between dimensions. The HIS success rate on users’ viewpoints was determined. (Full article...)

Recently featured:

Smart information systems in cybersecurity: An ethical analysis
Chemometric analysis of cannabinoids: Chemotaxonomy and domestication syndrome
National and transnational security implications of asymmetric access to and use of biological data