Search results
From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
- ...n data insertion into the workflow. Third, as a pilot, we have used an NDN naming scheme (agreed upon by the community and discussed in the "Method" section) ...e highly curated, each public repository uses their own standards for data naming, retrieval, and discovery that makes locating and utilizing these datasets85 KB (12,769 words) - 19:38, 22 March 2021
- ...used to identify the need for any extensions to the relevant international standards for interoperability and/or programmatic access. ...ecking the header of the files to make sure it is compliant with community convention standard) and QA of data through demonstrated functionality and performance72 KB (10,025 words) - 16:24, 29 April 2024
- ...lex ontological constructs or toolsets to synthesize multiple pre-existing standards, potentially including a variety of file formats, into a single overarching ...2060000739}}</ref>, and both aim to replace the multiplicity of ''ad hoc'' standards for diffraction images.85 KB (12,243 words) - 18:56, 10 November 2016
- ...staff communicated the completion of steps via email while using a naming convention for the relevant files. ...by two laboratory staff members to address any values that did not meet QC standards before entering the results into the LIS. Once the results have been review57 KB (8,058 words) - 16:09, 29 March 2024
- ...search]] context, projects rarely implement [[Quality (business)|quality]] standards. ...ile the complete implementation of an SLC according to commercial industry standards is largely not feasible in scientific research work, we propose a subset of61 KB (8,330 words) - 16:39, 29 April 2024
- ...e that third-party companies' data practices are compliant with university standards. This step is easily overlooked when individual research labs or groups pur *Naming convention adoption and establishment; and31 KB (4,453 words) - 20:36, 3 April 2024
- ...clature the Wikipedia article] and therefore may not meet the same editing standards as LIMSwiki. [[Category:Naming convention standards]]430 bytes (56 words) - 02:05, 12 March 2016
- ...se performance issues but at the expense of simplicity. Moreover the DICOM standards define a set of required meta-data based on the acquisition modality. Many ...this can lead to ambiguity if all users and all tools do not implement the convention. Moreover, only a limited amount of information can be stored in this forma42 KB (6,245 words) - 20:22, 12 January 2016