Journal:Expert search strategies: The information retrieval practices of healthcare information professionals
| Full article title | Expert search strategies: The information retrieval practices of healthcare information professionals |
|---|---|
| Journal | JMIR Medical Informatics |
| Author(s) | Russell-Rose, Tony; Chamberlain, Jon |
| Author affiliation(s) | UXLabs Ltd., University of Essex |
| Primary contact | Email: tgr at uxlabs dot co dot uk |
| Editors | Eysenbach, G. |
| Year published | 2017 |
| Volume and issue | 5 (4) |
| Page(s) | e33 |
| DOI | 10.2196/medinform.7680 |
| ISSN | 2291-9694 |
| Distribution license | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International |
| Website | http://medinform.jmir.org/2017/4/e33/ |
| Download | http://medinform.jmir.org/2017/4/e33/pdf (PDF) |
 |
This article should not be considered complete until this message box has been removed. This is a work in progress. |
Abstract
Background: Healthcare information professionals play a key role in closing the knowledge gap between medical research and clinical practice. Their work involves meticulous searching of literature databases using complex search strategies that can consist of hundreds of keywords, operators, and ontology terms. This process is prone to error and can lead to inefficiency and bias if performed incorrectly.
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the search behavior of healthcare information professionals, uncovering their needs, goals, and requirements for information retrieval systems.
Methods: A survey was distributed to healthcare information professionals via professional association email discussion lists. It investigated the search tasks they undertake, their techniques for search strategy formulation, their approaches to evaluating search results, and their preferred functionality for searching library-style databases. The popular literature search system PubMed was then evaluated to determine the extent to which their needs were met.
Results: The 107 respondents indicated that their information retrieval process relied on the use of complex, repeatable, and transparent search strategies. On average it took 60 minutes to formulate a search strategy, with a search task taking 4 hours and consisting of 15 strategy lines. Respondents reviewed a median of 175 results per search task, far more than they would ideally like (100). The most desired features of a search system were merging search queries and combining search results.
Conclusions: Healthcare information professionals routinely address some of the most challenging information retrieval problems of any profession. However, their needs are not fully supported by current literature search systems and there is demand for improved functionality, in particular regarding the development and management of search strategies.
Keywords: review, surveys and questionnaires, search engine, information management, information systems
Introduction
Background
References
Notes
This presentation is faithful to the original, with only a few minor changes to presentation. In several cases the PubMed ID was missing and was added to make the reference more useful. Grammar and vocabulary were cleaned up to make the article easier to read.
Per the distribution agreement, the following copyright information is also being added:
©Tony Russell-Rose, Jon Chamberlain. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 02.10.2017.
