1.4.1 General functions
1.4.1 General functions
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. The system offers non-SDMS trained personnel the ability to easily access system data via an intuitive, user-friendly Windows-type graphical user interface (GUI) which permits the display of stored data.
|
|
|
b. The system allows authorized users to configure their GUI to a specific language, character set, and time zone.
|
|
|
c. The system permits remote access for users, system admins, and support agents.
|
|
|
d. The system allows for the use of navigation keys to freely move from field to field.
|
|
|
e. The system allows data tables to be sorted.
|
|
|
f. The system can send on-screen output to a printer or file without contradicting view-only statuses.
|
|
|
g. The system contains one or more spell-check dictionaries that allow authorized users to add, edit, or remove entries.
|
|
|
h. The system uses human-readable metadata tags to describe and index all captured and archived data.
|
|
|
i. The system can generate metadata tags via derived value rules.
|
|
|
j. The system allows users to manually add metadata tags to files.
|
|
|
k. The system provides full metadata, keyword, and field search capability, including the use of multiple search criteria.
|
|
|
l. The system allows users to search for similar records based upon a set of metadata tag values.
|
|
|
m. The system allows users to build, save, and edit queries for future use.
|
|
|
n. The system can automate the search for and extraction of pertinent data, including the export of that data to external applications for additional processing and calculation.
|
|
|
o. The system allows users to attach comments to data and files.
|
|
|
p. The system's file viewer/explorer allow users to view native, processed, and archived data in its native file structure.
|
|
|
q. The system can link objects to other objects, e.g. linking a standard operating procedure (SOP) to a test result.
|
|
|
r. The system notifies users of events like the scheduling and completion of tasks.
|
|
|
s. The system includes the ability to set up alerts via email.
|
|
|
t. The system offers integrated or online user help screens?
|
|
|
1.4.2 Configuration and customization
1.4.2 Configuration and customization
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. The system can easily and efficiently be modified to meet lab growth and changing business needs.
|
|
|
b. The system has an application programming interface (API) or a similar software development toolkit (SDK). If web-based, the API should support Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP), representational state transfer (REST), or both.
|
|
|
c. The system allows a user to independently add fields without requiring reconfiguration of the system, even after routine upgrades and maintenance.
|
|
|
d. The system allows for the integration of additional printers and scanners both locally and externally.
|
|
|
1.4.3 Data capture
1.4.3 Data capture
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. The system can manage and store both sample- and non-sample-related data, including images from microscopes, GCMS scans of peaks, PDF files, spreadsheets, or even raw data files from instrument runs for later processing.
|
|
|
b. The system can manage and store media objects like digital photos, bitmaps, movies, and audio files.
|
|
|
c. The system allows multiple native instruments and users to enter data into the system simultaneously without disruption.
|
|
|
d. The system can interface with and import existing data from other databases and file shares.
|
|
|
e. The system supports data capture from a Citrix-based environment.
|
|
|
f. The system allows file indexes to be stored centrally while associated files are stored geographically.
|
|
|
g. The system allows users to organize captured data by project, date, location, instrument, etc.
|
|
|
h. The system can the route captured data based upon specified metadata tags.
|
|
|
i. The system allows full on-screen review of native instrument data prior to database commitment.
|
|
|
j. The system keeps captured native instrument and processed data and its format intact and captures modifications of that data as a version, including date and time of those modifications, for regulatory purposes.
|
|
|
k. The system can automatically normalize and store incoming data to a technology-neutral format like XML.
|
|
|
l. The system allows incoming and entered files to be converted into other open formats like JCAMP-DX, TraML, mzML, mzXML, AnIML, pepXML, and protXML.
|
|
|
m. The system can capture and store native instrument and processed data based on a scheduled time or a real-time event, such as upon file creation.
|
|
|
n. The system allows users to manually upload instrument data files that are not part of a scheduled upload.
|
|
|
o. The system allows for the specification of a retention period for captured native instrument and processed data and can enact it based on date-based metadata fields or a future event.
|
|
|
p. The system can remove data from client machines upon upload and/or backup, based on a schedule or retention policy.
|
|
|
q. The system allows users to review, restore, and reprocess original native instrument data on the original instrument acquisition software.
|
|
|
r. The system allows users to open and view captured native instrument files without restoring them.
|
|
|
s. The system allows captured processed data to be reused by other applications without having to reprocess it.
|
|
|
t. The system provides a method to extract data points from captured processed data and present it in a human-readable format.
|
|
|
u. The system can parse captured data files containing specified metadata into a live results table.
|
|
|
1.4.4 Data archiving and migration
1.4.4 Data archiving and migration
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. The system provides data archiving functionality for all contained data, without requiring an off-line mode.
|
|
|
b. The system allows for a configurable scheduled archive, not requiring human interaction with the data to be archived.
|
|
|
c. The system allows for a scheduled archive of data directly captured from a specific native instrument.
|
|
|
d. The system permits native instrument data to be archived and restored with its original directory structure.
|
|
|
e. The system allows for the specification of a retention period for archived and migrated data and can enact it based on date-based metadata fields or a future event.
|
|
|
f. The system ensures that held or locked native instrument data not captured during a scheduled archive will be captured during the next scheduled archive.
|
|
|
g. The system can perform archive and restore functions simultaneously with data capture and viewing functions without disruption.
|
|
|
h. The system allows native instrument and processed data migrated from an old SDMS version to be backed up and restored without alteration.
|
|
|
1.4.5 Instruments
1.4.5 Instruments
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. The system bilaterally interfaces with instruments and related software based on the Unix and Windows platforms.
|
|
|
b. The system can download data directly from laboratory instruments.
|
|
|
c. The system can track and report on the usage of attached laboratory instruments.
|
|
|
d. The system can automatically (or manually allow an authorized user to) remove an instrument from potential use when it falls out of tolerance limit or requires scheduled calibration.
|
|
|
e. The system maintains a reportable database of preventative maintenance, calibration, and repair records for attached laboratory instruments.
|
|
|
f. The system can schedule calibration, verification, and maintenance tasks on attached instruments and make that schedule available for viewing.
|
|
|
g. The system allows users to create and edit instrument maintenance profiles.
|
|
|
1.4.6 External system interfaces
1.4.6 External system interfaces
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. The system supports a library of common electronic data deliverable (EDD) formats.
|
|
|
b. The system can transfer data to and from other record management systems.
|
|
|
c. The system integrates with Microsoft Exchange services.
|
|
|
d. The system can import data from and export data to Microsoft Word, Excel, Access, and/or Powerpoint.
|
|
|
e. The system can interface with non-Microsoft programs.
|
|
|
f. The system can interface with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems.
|
|
|
g. The system can interface with internal and external laboratory systems like laboratory information management systems (LIMS) and electronic laboratory notebooks (ELNs).
|
|
|
h. The system can leverage the application programming interface (API) of other systems to establish integration between systems.
|
|
|
i. The system provides a real-time interface for viewing live and stored data transactions and errors generated by interfaced instruments and systems.
|
|
|
j. The system supports dockable mobile devices and handles information exchange between them and the system.
|
|
|
k. The system supports the use of optical character recognition (OCR) software.
|
|
|
1.4.7 Reporting
1.4.7 Reporting
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. The system includes a versatile report writer and forms generator that can generate reports from any data in the system.
|
|
|
b. The system can interface with a third-party reporting application.
|
|
|
c. The system allows the development of custom templates for different types of reports.
|
|
|
d. The system maintains template versions and renditions, allowing management and tracking of the template over time.
|
|
|
e. The system uses Microsoft Office tools for formatting reports.
|
|
|
f. The system provides multiple ways to visualize data in reports, including graphs, trend bars, pie charts, spectrum, etc. for the purpose of presenting information and identifying trends.
|
|
|
g. The system makes graphic and tabular data vector-scalable in reports.
|
|
|
h. The system allows for internal hyperlinking to source data in reports.
|
|
|
i. The system allows users to manually adjust inacurate data parsing routines for reports.
|
|
|
j. The system can indicate whether a report is preliminary, amended, corrected, or final while retaining revision history.
|
|
|
k. The system can automatically generate laboratory reports of findings and other written documents.
|
|
|
l. The system provides an ad-hoc web reporting interface to report on user-selected criteria.
|
|
|
m. The system can automatically generate and post periodic static summary reports on an internal web server.
|
|
|
n. The system can transmit reports in a variety of ways including fax, e-mail, print, and website in formats like RTF, PDF, HTML, XML, DOC, XLS, and TXT.
|
|
|
o. The system supports PDF/A, an ISO-standardized version of the Portable Document Format (PDF).
|
|
|
p. The system includes a rules engine to determine the recipients of reports and other documents based on definable parameters.
|
|
|
q. The system provides printer-friendly audit trails for cleaner reporting of audit data.
|
|
|
r. The system provides an interface for external clients to search, generate, and view processed data reports based on metadata tags.
|
|
|
s. The system provides document workflow management tools for streamlining their creation, review, modification, and approval.
|
|
|
|