1.4.1 General functions
1.4.1 General functions
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. The system offers non-ELN trained personnel the ability to easily access system data via an intuitive, user-friendly Windows-type graphical user interface (GUI) which permits the display of stored data.
|
|
|
b. The system allows authorized users to configure their GUI to a specific language, character set, and time zone.
|
|
|
c. The system permits remote access for users, system admins, and support agents?
|
|
|
d. The system allows for the use of navigation keys to freely move from field to field.
|
|
|
e. The system allows data tables to be sorted.
|
|
|
f. The system can send on-screen output to a printer or file without contradicting view-only statuses.
|
|
|
g. The system supports multiple users and instruments entering data simultaneously, without disruption.
|
|
|
h. The system contains one or more spell-check dictionaries that allow authorized users to add, edit, or remove entries.
|
|
|
i. The system integrates chemical drawing and computational tools.
|
|
|
j. The system includes a synthesis sheet parser and generator.
|
|
|
k. The system allows the import of chemical structure and spectroscopic files?
|
|
|
l. The system provides full metadata, keyword, and field search capability, including the use of multiple search criteria.
|
|
|
m. The system allows for advanced queries of molecular patterns and properties, like those associated with the SMARTS language.
|
|
|
n. The system permits users to query by functional group or designed structure.
|
|
|
o. The system allows users to build, save, and edit queries for future use.
|
|
|
p. The system includes the ability to search and import from multiple databases, including those containing legacy data.
|
|
|
q. The system provides data archival and retention functionality for both paper-based and electronic laboratory records, effectively maintaining the archives as technology changes.
|
|
|
r. The system allows bookmarking of pages, images, experiments, and other content.
|
|
|
s. The system notifies users of events like the scheduling and completion of tasks.
|
|
|
t. The system includes the ability to set up alerts via email.
|
|
|
u. The system supports scheduling of tasks like analysis requests, instrument maintenance, and group meetings.
|
|
|
v. The system has real-time messaging capabilities for experiment and project collaborators.
|
|
|
w. The system supports the use of a voice recognition system (for navigation or transcription) or has that functionality.
|
|
|
x. The system offers integrated or online user help screens.
|
|
|
1.4.2 Configuration and customization
1.4.2 Configuration and customization
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. The system architecture is modular or extensible and can easily and efficiently be modified to facilitate the addition of new functionality as business needs change.
|
|
|
b. The system has an application programming interface (API) or a similar software development toolkit (SDK). If web-based, the API should support Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP), representational state transfer (REST), or both.
|
|
|
c. The system supports customized screens with user-definable information specific to a customer, department, analysis, etc.
|
|
|
d. The system allows a user to independently add fields without requiring reconfiguration of the system, even after routine upgrades and maintenance.
|
|
|
e. The system permits users to create personal and sharable experiment templates.
|
|
|
f. The system allows for the integration of additional printers and scanners both locally and externally.
|
|
|
1.4.3 Pre-experiment
1.4.3 Receiving and scheduling
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. The system supports barcoded sample labeling and tracking.
|
|
|
b. The system provides compound and batch registration.
|
|
|
c. The system provides extensive experiment management tools to create, manage, and run single-step, multi-step, and other types of experiments.
|
|
|
d. The system provides tools for making advanced chemical calculations, including stoichiometric, titration, and reaction yield calculations.
|
|
|
e. The system allows editing of biological sequences at the molecular level.
|
|
|
f. The system allows the creation of searchable image annotations.
|
|
|
1.4.4 Post-experiment
1.4.4 Analysis and data entry
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. The system can manage and store both sample- and non-sample-related data, including images from microscopes, GCMS scans of peaks, PDF files, spreadsheets, or even raw data files from instrument runs for later processing.
|
|
|
b. The system can manage and store media objects like digital photos, bitmaps, movies, and audio files.
|
|
|
o. The system can link objects to other objects, e.g. linking a specification to an experimental result.
|
|
|
k. Does your system provide a searchable repository for user notebooks present and past?
|
|
|
h. Can your system process text-to-structure conversions automatically?
|
|
|
a. Does your system allow users to comment on experiment results, observations, and conjectures as well as allow for linking to and from comments?
|
|
|
b. Does your system allow users to create project Gantt charts?
|
|
|
c. Does your system capture and store an encrypted PDF (or other document format) of a completed page?
|
|
|
d. Does your system capture and store images from image analysis?
|
|
|
g. The system can process automated uploading of field-derived sample data.
|
|
|
p. The system permits manual data entry of experiment results and other data.
|
|
|
s. The system allows automated or semi-automated data insertion.
|
|
|
t. The system stores non-narrative textual results in searchable fields.
|
|
|
e. The system can graphically display the results of one or more experiments in a graph (normalized or otherwise) for the purpose of visualizing data or searching for possible trends.
|
|
|
h. The system stores test-related analysis comments with the experiment.
|
|
|
i. The system provides auto-commenting for common laboratory result comments.
|
|
|
j. The system provides for high-volume multi-component transfers of test results, with the ability to automatically match samples to experiments in either a backlog mode or a designated file mode, to parse the data, and to review and commit the sample data.
|
|
|
q. The system validates/approves sample data prior to being moved to the main database.
|
|
|
k. The system's results validation process accesses all information about a sample or group of samples, including comments or special information about the sample.
|
|
|
n. The system uses a menu-driven process for results validation.
|
|
|
p. The system can clearly differentiate released preliminary data from fully validated results.
|
|
|
u. The system can manage QA/QC test results.
|
|
|
v. The system allows manual entry of QA/QC data not captured as part of the system's regular processes.
|
|
|
1.4.6 Instruments
1.4.6 Instruments
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. The system bilaterally interfaces with instruments and related software based on the Unix and Windows platforms.
|
|
|
b. The system can download data directly from laboratory instruments.
|
|
|
c. The system allows file transfer of data from instruments via intelligent interfaces or multi-sample/multi-test ASCII files, with full on-screen review prior to database commitment.
|
|
|
d. The system can track and report on the usage of attached laboratory instruments.
|
|
|
e. The system can automatically (or manually allow an authorized user to) remove an instrument from potential use when it falls out of tolerance limit or requires scheduled calibration.
|
|
|
f. The system maintains a reportable database of preventative maintenance, calibration, and repair records for attached laboratory instruments.
|
|
|
g. The system can schedule calibration, verification, and maintenance tasks on attached instruments and make that schedule available for viewing.
|
|
|
h. The system allows users to create and edit instrument maintenance profiles.
|
|
|
1.4.7 External system interfaces
1.4.7 External system interfaces
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. The system supports a library of common electronic data deliverable (EDD) formats.
|
|
|
b. The system can transfer data to and from other record management systems.
|
|
|
c. The system integrates with Microsoft Exchange services.
|
|
|
d. The system can import data from and export data to Microsoft Word, Excel, Access, and/or Powerpoint.
|
|
|
e. The system can interface with non-Microsoft programs.
|
|
|
f. The system can interface with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems.
|
|
|
g. The system can interface with internal and external laboratory systems like laboratory information management systems (LIMS) and electronic laboratory notebooks (ELNs).
|
|
|
h. The system can leverage the application programming interface (API) of other systems to establish integration between systems.
|
|
|
i. The system can interface with third-party chemical drawing tools like ChemDraw, MarvinSketch, and Ketcher.
|
|
|
j. The system can interface with chemistry databases, compound management systems, and substance logistics systems.
|
|
|
k. The system provides a real-time interface for viewing live and stored data transactions and errors generated by interfaced instruments and systems.
|
|
|
l. The system supports dockable mobile devices and handles information exchange between them and the system.
|
|
|
m. The system supports the use of optical character recognition (OCR) software.
|
|
|
1.4.8 Reporting
1.4.8 Reporting
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. The system includes a versatile report writer and forms generator that can generate reports from any data in the system.
|
|
|
b. The system can interface with a third-party reporting application.
|
|
|
c. The system includes a custom graphic generator for forms.
|
|
|
d. The system allows the development of custom templates for different types of reports.
|
|
|
e. The system maintains template versions and renditions, allowing management and tracking of the template over time.
|
|
|
f. The system can generate template letters for semi-annual reports.
|
|
|
g. The system uses Microsoft Office tools for formatting reports.
|
|
|
h. The system automatically generates experiment reports at specified points in the experimental process.
|
|
|
i. The system provides multiple ways to visualize data in reports, including graphs, trend bars, pie charts, spectrum, etc. for the purpose of presenting information and identifying trends.
|
|
|
j. The system makes graphic and tabular data vector-scalable in reports.
|
|
|
k. The system allows for internal hyperlinking to source data in reports.
|
|
|
l. Can your system indicate whether a report is preliminary, amended, corrected, or final while retaining revision history?
|
|
|
m. Does your system support both structured and synoptic reporting?
|
|
|
n. Can your system generate management and turn-around time reports and graphs?
|
|
|
o. Can your system generate customized final reports?
|
|
|
p. Can your system automatically generate laboratory reports of findings and other written documents?
|
|
|
q. Can your system automatically generate individual and aggregate workload and productivity reports on all operational and administrative activities?
|
|
|
r. Can your system automatically generate and transmit exception trails and exception reports for all entered and/or stored out-of-specification data?
|
|
|
s. Can your system generate a read-only progress report that allows for printed reports of sample status and data collected to date?
|
|
|
t. Does your system provide an ad-hoc web reporting interface to report on user-selected criteria?
|
|
|
u. Can your system automatically generate and update control charts?
|
|
|
v. Can your system generate QA/QC charts for all recovery, precision, and lab control samples via a full statistics package, including Levy-Jennings plots and Westgard multi-rule?
|
|
|
w. Does your system display history of previous results for an analyte's sample point in a tabular report, graphic trend chart, and statistical summary?
|
|
|
x. Can your system automatically generate and post periodic static summary reports on an internal web server?
|
|
|
y. Does your system transmit results in a variety of ways including fax, e-mail, print, and website in formats like RTF, PDF, HTML, XML, DOC, XLS, and TXT? Please explain.
|
|
|
z. Does your system electronically transmit results via final report only when all case reviews have been completed by the case coordinator?
|
|
|
aa. Does your system include a rules engine to determine the recipients of reports and other documents based on definable parameters?
|
|
|
ab. Does your system allow database access using user-friendly report writing and inquiry tools?
|
|
|
1.4.9 Laboratory management
1.4.9 Laboratory management
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
d. Does your system provide multi-lab management tools?
|
|
|
a. Does your system allow the creation, modification, and duplication of user profiles?
|
|
|
b. Does your system allow entry, maintenance, and administration of customers, suppliers, and other outside entities?
|
|
|
c. Does your system allow the creation, modification, and maintenance of user training records and associated training materials?
|
|
|
d. Does your system allow the management of information workflow, including notifications for requests and exigencies?
|
|
|
e. Does your system allow the management of documents like SOPs, MSDS, etc. to better ensure they are current and traceable?
|
|
|
f. Does your system allow the management and monitoring of resources by analyst, priority, analysis, and instrument?
|
|
|
g. Does your system allow authorized persons to select and assign tasks by analysts, work group, instrument, test, sample, and priority?
|
|
|
h. Does your system allow authorized persons to review unassigned work by discipline and by lab?
|
|
|
i. Does your system allow authorized persons to review pending work by analyst prior to assigning additional work?
|
|
|
j. Does your system manage and report on reference samples, reagents, and other inventory, including by department? If so, to what extent?
|
|
|
k. Does your system automatically warn specified users when inventory counts reach a definable threshold and either prompt for or process a reorder?
|
|
|
l. Does your system allow authorized users to monitor and report on reference and reagent creation, use, and expiration?
|
|
|
m. Does your system allow authorized users to search invoice information by invoice number, account number, accession, payment types, client, or requested diagnostic test(s)?
|
|
|
n. Does your system include performance assessment tracking?
|
|
|
o. Can your system receive, record, and maintain customer and employee feedback and apply tools to track the investigation, resolution, and success of any necessary corrective action?
|
|
|
p. Does your system monitor proficiency test assignment, completion, and casework qualification for analytical staff?
|
|
|
q. Does your system provide analysis tools to better support laboratory functions like resource planning, productivity projections, workload distribution, and work scheduling? Do those tools display information in a consolidated view, with the ability to drill down to more detailed data? Please explain.
|
|
|
r. Does your system calculate administrative and lab costs?
|
|
|
s. Does your system capture and maintain patient, submitter, supplier, and other client demographics and billing information for costing, invoicing, collecting, reporting, and other billing activities?
|
|
|
t. Does your system support multiple customer payment sources (e.g. grants}? Please explain the extent.
|
|
|
u. Does your system track number of visits per specific industry?
|
|
|
|