1.4.1 General functions
1.4.1 General functions
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. The system offers non-ELN trained personnel the ability to easily access system data via an intuitive, user-friendly Windows-type graphical user interface (GUI) which permits the display of stored data.
|
|
|
b. The system allows authorized users to configure their GUI to a specific language, character set, and time zone.
|
|
|
c. The system permits remote access for users, system admins, and support agents?
|
|
|
d. The system allows for the use of navigation keys to freely move from field to field.
|
|
|
e. The system allows data tables to be sorted.
|
|
|
f. The system can send on-screen output to a printer or file without contradicting view-only statuses.
|
|
|
g. The system supports multiple users and instruments entering data simultaneously, without disruption.
|
|
|
h. The system contains one or more spell-check dictionaries that allow authorized users to add, edit, or remove entries.
|
|
|
i. The system integrates chemical drawing and computational tools.
|
|
|
j. The system includes a synthesis sheet parser and generator.
|
|
|
k. The system allows the import of chemical structure and spectroscopic files?
|
|
|
l. The system provides full metadata, keyword, and field search capability, including the use of multiple search criteria.
|
|
|
m. The system allows for advanced queries of molecular patterns and properties, like those associated with the SMARTS language.
|
|
|
n. The system permits users to query by functional group or designed structure.
|
|
|
o. The system allows users to build, save, and edit queries for future use.
|
|
|
p. The system includes the ability to search and import from multiple databases, including those containing legacy data.
|
|
|
q. The system provides data archival and retention functionality for both paper-based and electronic laboratory records, effectively maintaining the archives as technology changes.
|
|
|
r. The system allows bookmarking of pages, images, experiments, and other content.
|
|
|
s. The system notifies users of events like the scheduling and completion of tasks.
|
|
|
t. The system includes the ability to set up alerts via email.
|
|
|
u. The system supports scheduling of tasks like analysis requests, instrument maintenance, and group meetings.
|
|
|
v. The system has real-time messaging capabilities for experiment and project collaborators.
|
|
|
w. The system supports the use of a voice recognition system (for navigation or transcription) or has that functionality.
|
|
|
x. The system offers integrated or online user help screens.
|
|
|
1.4.2 Configuration and customization
1.4.2 Configuration and customization
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. The system architecture is modular or extensible and can easily and efficiently be modified to facilitate the addition of new functionality as business needs change.
|
|
|
b. The system has an application programming interface (API) or a similar software development toolkit (SDK). If web-based, the API should support Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP), representational state transfer (REST), or both.
|
|
|
c. The system supports customized screens with user-definable information specific to a customer, department, analysis, etc.
|
|
|
d. The system allows a user to independently add fields without requiring reconfiguration of the system, even after routine upgrades and maintenance.
|
|
|
e. The system permits users to create personal and sharable experiment templates.
|
|
|
f. The system allows for the integration of additional printers and scanners both locally and externally.
|
|
|
1.4.3 Pre-experiment
1.4.3 Receiving and scheduling
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. The system supports barcoded sample labeling and tracking.
|
|
|
b. The system provides compound and batch registration.
|
|
|
c. The system provides extensive experiment management tools to create, manage, and run single-step, multi-step, and other types of experiments.
|
|
|
d. The system provides tools for making advanced chemical calculations, including stoichiometric, titration, and reaction yield calculations.
|
|
|
e. The system allows editing of biological sequences at the molecular level.
|
|
|
f. The system allows the creation of searchable image annotations.
|
|
|
1.4.4 Post-experiment
1.4.4 Analysis and data entry
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. The system can manage and store both sample- and non-sample-related data, including images from microscopes, GCMS scans of peaks, PDF files, spreadsheets, or even raw data files from instrument runs for later processing.
|
|
|
b. The system can manage and store media objects like digital photos, bitmaps, movies, and audio files.
|
|
|
o. The system can link objects to other objects, e.g. linking a specification to an experimental result.
|
|
|
k. Does your system provide a searchable repository for user notebooks present and past?
|
|
|
h. Can your system process text-to-structure conversions automatically?
|
|
|
g. The system can process automated uploading of field-derived sample data.
|
|
|
o. Does your system allow file transfer of data from instruments via intelligent interfaces or multi-sample/multi-test ASCII files, with full on-screen review prior to database commitment?
|
|
|
p. Does your system permit manual data entry into an electronic worksheet of test measurements and results?
|
|
|
q. Does your system allow incorrectly inputted data to be manually corrected?
|
|
|
r. Does your system provide colored visual indication of previously entered data as well as new data associated with a single sample when a result is entered, with the indicator changing color if the value is out of specification?
|
|
|
s. Does your system allow automated or semi-automated data insertion?
|
|
|
t. Does your system store non-narrative textual results in searchable fields?
|
|
|
1.4.5 Post-analysis and validation
1.4.5 Post-analysis and validation
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. Does your system update sample/item status when tests are completed?
|
|
|
b. Can your system automatically reorder a test or order additional tests if results don't meet lab-defined criteria?
|
|
|
c. Does your system read results from previously entered tests to calculate a final result and immediately display the calculated result?
|
|
|
d. Does your system allow authorized users to review all analytical results, including pricing, spec violations, history or trend analysis by analyte, and comments?
|
|
|
e. Can your system graphically display the results of one or more tests in a graph (normalized or otherwise) for the purpose of visualizing data or searching for possible trends?
|
|
|
f. Does your system allow on-screen review of the stored test result, diluted result with corrected method detection limits (MDLs), and qualifiers after running samples for multiple dilutions as in gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS)?
|
|
|
g. Does your system display the standard operating procedure (SOP) associated with each test result to ensure proper techniques were used?
|
|
|
h. Does your system store test-related analysis comments with the test?
|
|
|
i. Does your system provide auto-commenting for common laboratory result comments?
|
|
|
j. Does your system provide for high-volume multi-component transfers of test results, with the ability to automatically match samples to data files in either a backlog mode or a designated file mode, to parse the data, and to review and commit the sample data?
|
|
|
k. Does your system's results validation process access all information about a sample or group of samples, including comments or special information about the sample?
|
|
|
l. Does your system's results validation process check each result against its individual sample location specifications (both warning and specification limits)?
|
|
|
m. Does your system support validation at the analysis and sample level, while also prohibiting sample validation when analysis validation is incomplete?
|
|
|
n. Does your system use a menu-driven process for results validation?
|
|
|
o. Does your system provide secure electronic peer review of results?
|
|
|
p. Can your system clearly differentiate released preliminary data from fully validated results?
|
|
|
q. Does your system validate/approve data prior to being moved to the main database?
|
|
|
r. Does your system fully manage all aspects of laboratory quality control, including the reporting and charting of all quality control data captured in the lab? Please explain how.
|
|
|
s. Does your system provide a base for a quality assurance program, including proficiency testing, scheduled maintenance of equipment, etc.? Please explain how.
|
|
|
t. Does your system distinguish QA/QC duplicates from normal samples?
|
|
|
u. Does your system allow QA/QC tests to be easily created and associated with the primary analytical test?
|
|
|
v. Does your system allow manual entry of QA and QC data not captured as part of the system's regular processes?
|
|
|
w. Does your system calculate monthly QA/QC percentages for testing?
|
|
|
x. Does your system automatically flag out-of-range quality control limits?
|
|
|
y. Does your system check data files for specification and corrects them for specific reporting and analyte limits and qualifiers like dilution factor, automatically assigning qualifiers based on project analyte limiting?
|
|
|
1.4.6 Instruments
1.4.6 Instruments
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. Does your system bilaterally interface with instruments and related software? If so, please provide details.
|
|
|
b. Can your system download data directly from laboratory instruments?
|
|
|
c. Does your system permit the defining and exporting of sequences to instruments?
|
|
|
d. Does your system track and report on laboratory equipment usage?
|
|
|
e. Does your system allow automatic or manual reservation/scheduling of laboratory instruments?
|
|
|
f. Does your system automatically (or manually allow an authorized user to) remove an instrument from potential use when it falls out of tolerance limit or requires scheduled calibration?
|
|
|
g. Does your system provide a database of preventative maintenance, calibration, and repair records for laboratory equipment, preferably supported by standardized reporting?
|
|
|
h. Can your system schedule calibration, verification, and maintenance tasks in the worksheets or work flow process and make that schedule available for viewing?
|
|
|
i. Does your system allow users to create and edit instrument maintenance profiles?
|
|
|
1.4.7 External system interfaces
1.4.7 External system interfaces
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. Does your system support a library of common and/or basic electronic data deliverable (EDD) formats? If so, which?
|
|
|
b. Can your system transfer data to and from another record management system? If so, how?
|
|
|
c. Does your system integrate with Microsoft Exchange services?
|
|
|
d. Can your system import data from and export data to Microsoft Word, Excel, and/or Access?
|
|
|
e. Can your system interface with non-Microsoft programs? If so, which?
|
|
|
f. Can your system interface with external billing systems? If so, how?
|
|
|
g. Can your system interface with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems? If so, how?
|
|
|
h. Can your system interface with external contract or reference laboratories to electronically send or retrieve datasheets, analysis reports, and other related information?
|
|
|
i. Can your system exchange data with National Identification System (NAIS) tracking systems?
|
|
|
j. Can your system generate and exchange data with other systems using Health Level 7 (HL7) standards?
|
|
|
k. Can your system leverage the application programming interface (API) of other systems to establish integration between systems?
|
|
|
l. Does your system provide a real-time interface for viewing live and stored data transactions and errors generated by interfaced instruments and systems?
|
|
|
m. Can your system transmit status changes of samples, inventory, equipment, etc. to an external system?
|
|
|
n. Can your system direct output from ad-hoc queries to a computer file for subsequent analysis by other software?
|
|
|
o. Does your system support the manual retransmission of data to interfaced systems?
|
|
|
p. Does your system support dockable mobile devices and handle information exchange between them and the system?
|
|
|
q. Does your system support the use of optical character recognition (OCR) software?
|
|
|
1.4.8 Reporting
1.4.8 Reporting
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
a. Does your system include a versatile report writer and forms generator that can generate reports from any data in tables? If so, please provide details.
|
|
|
b. Does your system include a custom graphic generator for forms?
|
|
|
c. Does your system interface with a third-party reporting application?
|
|
|
d. Does your system allow the development of custom templates for different types of reports?
|
|
|
e. Does your system maintain template versions and renditions, allowing management and tracking of the template over time?
|
|
|
f. Can your system generate template letters for semi-annual reports?
|
|
|
g. Does your system support report queries by fields/keys, status, completion, or other variables?
|
|
|
h. Does your system use Microsoft Office tools for formatting reports?
|
|
|
i. Does your system support multiple web browsers for viewing online reports? If so, list which ones.
|
|
|
j. Can your system generate, store, reproduce, and display laboratory, statistical, and inventory reports on demand, including narrative?
|
|
|
k. Does your system include several standard reports and query routines to access all samples with the pending status through a backlog report that includes the following criteria: all laboratory, department, analysis, submittal date, collection date, prep test complete, location, project, sample delivery group, and other user-selectable options?
|
|
|
l. Can your system indicate whether a report is preliminary, amended, corrected, or final while retaining revision history?
|
|
|
m. Does your system support both structured and synoptic reporting?
|
|
|
n. Can your system generate management and turn-around time reports and graphs?
|
|
|
o. Can your system generate customized final reports?
|
|
|
p. Can your system automatically generate laboratory reports of findings and other written documents?
|
|
|
q. Can your system automatically generate individual and aggregate workload and productivity reports on all operational and administrative activities?
|
|
|
r. Can your system automatically generate and transmit exception trails and exception reports for all entered and/or stored out-of-specification data?
|
|
|
s. Can your system generate a read-only progress report that allows for printed reports of sample status and data collected to date?
|
|
|
t. Does your system provide an ad-hoc web reporting interface to report on user-selected criteria?
|
|
|
u. Can your system automatically generate and update control charts?
|
|
|
v. Can your system generate QA/QC charts for all recovery, precision, and lab control samples via a full statistics package, including Levy-Jennings plots and Westgard multi-rule?
|
|
|
w. Does your system display history of previous results for an analyte's sample point in a tabular report, graphic trend chart, and statistical summary?
|
|
|
x. Can your system automatically generate and post periodic static summary reports on an internal web server?
|
|
|
y. Does your system transmit results in a variety of ways including fax, e-mail, print, and website in formats like RTF, PDF, HTML, XML, DOC, XLS, and TXT? Please explain.
|
|
|
z. Does your system electronically transmit results via final report only when all case reviews have been completed by the case coordinator?
|
|
|
aa. Does your system include a rules engine to determine the recipients of reports and other documents based on definable parameters?
|
|
|
ab. Does your system allow database access using user-friendly report writing and inquiry tools?
|
|
|
1.4.9 Laboratory management
1.4.9 Laboratory management
|
Request for information
|
Requirement code
|
Vendor response
|
d. Does your system provide multi-lab management tools?
|
|
|
a. Does your system allow the creation, modification, and duplication of user profiles?
|
|
|
b. Does your system allow entry, maintenance, and administration of customers, suppliers, and other outside entities?
|
|
|
c. Does your system allow the creation, modification, and maintenance of user training records and associated training materials?
|
|
|
d. Does your system allow the management of information workflow, including notifications for requests and exigencies?
|
|
|
e. Does your system allow the management of documents like SOPs, MSDS, etc. to better ensure they are current and traceable?
|
|
|
f. Does your system allow the management and monitoring of resources by analyst, priority, analysis, and instrument?
|
|
|
g. Does your system allow authorized persons to select and assign tasks by analysts, work group, instrument, test, sample, and priority?
|
|
|
h. Does your system allow authorized persons to review unassigned work by discipline and by lab?
|
|
|
i. Does your system allow authorized persons to review pending work by analyst prior to assigning additional work?
|
|
|
j. Does your system manage and report on reference samples, reagents, and other inventory, including by department? If so, to what extent?
|
|
|
k. Does your system automatically warn specified users when inventory counts reach a definable threshold and either prompt for or process a reorder?
|
|
|
l. Does your system allow authorized users to monitor and report on reference and reagent creation, use, and expiration?
|
|
|
m. Does your system allow authorized users to search invoice information by invoice number, account number, accession, payment types, client, or requested diagnostic test(s)?
|
|
|
n. Does your system include performance assessment tracking?
|
|
|
o. Can your system receive, record, and maintain customer and employee feedback and apply tools to track the investigation, resolution, and success of any necessary corrective action?
|
|
|
p. Does your system monitor proficiency test assignment, completion, and casework qualification for analytical staff?
|
|
|
q. Does your system provide analysis tools to better support laboratory functions like resource planning, productivity projections, workload distribution, and work scheduling? Do those tools display information in a consolidated view, with the ability to drill down to more detailed data? Please explain.
|
|
|
r. Does your system calculate administrative and lab costs?
|
|
|
s. Does your system capture and maintain patient, submitter, supplier, and other client demographics and billing information for costing, invoicing, collecting, reporting, and other billing activities?
|
|
|
t. Does your system support multiple customer payment sources (e.g. grants}? Please explain the extent.
|
|
|
u. Does your system track number of visits per specific industry?
|
|
|
|