Difference between revisions of "User:Shawndouglas/sandbox/sublevel5"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 20: Line 20:


==Meeting international food safety regulatory challenges==
==Meeting international food safety regulatory challenges==
ISO 22000—first published in 2005—was originally designed to be aligned with quality management standards like [[ISO 9000|ISO 9001]] and the HACCP principles, as adopted by the ''Codex Alimentarius''.<ref name="HolahPric23">{{Citation |last=Holah |first=John |date=2023 |title=Principles of Hygienic Practice in Food Processing and Manufacturing |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780128200131000292 |work=Food Safety Management |language=en |publisher=Elsevier |pages=587–613 |doi=10.1016/b978-0-12-820013-1.00029-2 |isbn=978-0-12-820013-1 |accessdate=}}</ref> And while ISO 9001 wasn't exclusively directed at laboratories, over the years laboratories have adopted that standard. With [[ISO/IEC 17025]] having significant alignment with ISO 9001 (while being specifically designed for analytical and calibration laboratories)<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Miguel |first=Anna |last2=Moreira |first2=Renata |last3=Oliveira |first3=André |date=2021 |title=ISO/IEC 17025: HISTORY AND INTRODUCTION OF CONCEPTS |url=http://quimicanova.sbq.org.br/audiencia_pdf.asp?aid2=9279&nomeArquivo=AG2020-0467.pdf |journal=Química Nova |doi=10.21577/0100-4042.20170726}}</ref> and ISO 22000 having alignment with ISO 9001, it's not surprising there is occasional minor confusion between ISO 22000 and ISO/IEC 17025, as well as their impacts on the food and beverage industry.
ISO 22000—first published in 2005—was originally designed to be aligned with quality management standards like [[ISO 9000|ISO 9001]] and the hazard analysis and critical control points (HACCP) principles, as adopted by the ''Codex Alimentarius''.<ref name="HolahPric23">{{Citation |last=Holah |first=John |date=2023 |title=Principles of Hygienic Practice in Food Processing and Manufacturing |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780128200131000292 |work=Food Safety Management |language=en |publisher=Elsevier |pages=587–613 |doi=10.1016/b978-0-12-820013-1.00029-2 |isbn=978-0-12-820013-1 |accessdate=}}</ref> And while ISO 9001 wasn't exclusively directed at laboratories, over the years laboratories have adopted that standard. With [[ISO/IEC 17025]] having significant alignment with ISO 9001 (while being specifically designed for analytical and calibration laboratories)<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Miguel |first=Anna |last2=Moreira |first2=Renata |last3=Oliveira |first3=André |date=2021 |title=ISO/IEC 17025: HISTORY AND INTRODUCTION OF CONCEPTS |url=http://quimicanova.sbq.org.br/audiencia_pdf.asp?aid2=9279&nomeArquivo=AG2020-0467.pdf |journal=Química Nova |doi=10.21577/0100-4042.20170726}}</ref> and ISO 22000 having alignment with ISO 9001, it's not surprising there is occasional minor confusion between ISO 22000 and ISO/IEC 17025, as well as their impacts on the food and beverage industry.


Though some countries may have legal requirements for food manufacturers to adopt the HACCP principles enshrined in ISO 22000, other countries may not have such requirements, leaving ISO 9001, 17025, and 22000 adoption voluntary. However, the clientele of a given food manufacturer may demand they be accredited to one or more of these standards, or even audited to the requirements of the likes of the Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI).<ref name="HolahPric23" /> However, with food safety regulations growing in number (though differing, sometimes greatly, among countries), and many of those regulations requires conformance to one ore more national and international standards,<ref name="MahmoudAnHist20">{{cite web |url=https://www.food-safety.com/articles/6448-an-historical-food-safety-approach-for-the-world-we-want |title=An Historical Food Safety Approach for the World We Want |author=Mahmoud, B. |work=Food Safety Magazine |date=04 February 2020 |accessdate=05 December 2023}}</ref>, food and beverage companies of all types are increasingly finding they need to not only meet the requirements of clientele but also stay ahead of the changing regulatory landscape.
Though some countries may have legal requirements for food manufacturers to adopt the HACCP principles enshrined in ISO 22000— other countries may not have such requirements, leaving ISO 9001, 17025, and 22000 adoption voluntary. However, the clientele of a given food manufacturer may demand they be accredited to one or more of these standards, or even audited to the requirements of the likes of the Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI).<ref name="HolahPric23" /> However, with food safety regulations growing in number (though differing, sometimes greatly, among countries), and many of those regulations requires conformance to one ore more national and international standards,<ref name="MahmoudAnHist20">{{cite web |url=https://www.food-safety.com/articles/6448-an-historical-food-safety-approach-for-the-world-we-want |title=An Historical Food Safety Approach for the World We Want |author=Mahmoud, B. |work=Food Safety Magazine |date=04 February 2020 |accessdate=05 December 2023}}</ref>, food and beverage companies of all types are increasingly finding they need to not only meet the requirements of clientele but also stay ahead of the changing regulatory landscape.





Revision as of 22:19, 5 December 2023

Sandbox begins below

[[File:|right|350px]] Title: How can a LIMS assist food and beverage industry compliance with ISO 22000 and ISO/IEC 17025?

Author for citation: Shawn E. Douglas

License for content: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Publication date: November 2023

Introduction

Meeting international food safety regulatory challenges

ISO 22000—first published in 2005—was originally designed to be aligned with quality management standards like ISO 9001 and the hazard analysis and critical control points (HACCP) principles, as adopted by the Codex Alimentarius.[1] And while ISO 9001 wasn't exclusively directed at laboratories, over the years laboratories have adopted that standard. With ISO/IEC 17025 having significant alignment with ISO 9001 (while being specifically designed for analytical and calibration laboratories)[2] and ISO 22000 having alignment with ISO 9001, it's not surprising there is occasional minor confusion between ISO 22000 and ISO/IEC 17025, as well as their impacts on the food and beverage industry.

Though some countries may have legal requirements for food manufacturers to adopt the HACCP principles enshrined in ISO 22000— other countries may not have such requirements, leaving ISO 9001, 17025, and 22000 adoption voluntary. However, the clientele of a given food manufacturer may demand they be accredited to one or more of these standards, or even audited to the requirements of the likes of the Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI).[1] However, with food safety regulations growing in number (though differing, sometimes greatly, among countries), and many of those regulations requires conformance to one ore more national and international standards,[3], food and beverage companies of all types are increasingly finding they need to not only meet the requirements of clientele but also stay ahead of the changing regulatory landscape.


A LIMS' role in complying with ISO 22000 and ISO/IEC 17025

Conclusion

References