Difference between revisions of "User:Shawndouglas/sandbox/sublevel12"
Shawndouglas (talk | contribs) |
Shawndouglas (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
*https://www.rockefeller.edu/markus-library/uploads/www.rockefeller.edu/sites/207/2019/05/Electronic-Notebooks-CCTS.pdf | *https://www.rockefeller.edu/markus-library/uploads/www.rockefeller.edu/sites/207/2019/05/Electronic-Notebooks-CCTS.pdf | ||
==Pairing | ==Pairing a LIMS and ELN together== | ||
Revision as of 22:01, 5 March 2024
 |
This is sublevel12 of my sandbox, where I play with features and test MediaWiki code. If you wish to leave a comment for me, please see my discussion page instead. |
Sandbox begins below
[[File:|right|350px]] Title: Is there a benefit to utilizing both a LIMS and an ELN in the lab?
Author for citation: Shawn E. Douglas
License for content: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Publication date: March 2023
Introduction
The ELN and what it does outside the scope of a LIMS
To answer the question, knowledge of what an ELN does and what it addresses outside of a LIMS is important. An ELN is a modern electronic equivalent of the traditional paper-based laboratory notebook, which historically has served as a collection of scribblings—often with individual, regional, or temporal idiosyncratic styles of "subjectivity, unruliness, and privacy"[1]—concerning the notes and protocols of one or more particular scientific research endeavors.[1][2] In recent times, these scribblings have become more recognizably organized and thorough as a necessary part of presenting all the details of experiments, observations, and analyses such that the results can be reproduced and verified by peers in the scientific community (often referred to as part of a broader "reproducibility crisis").[2][3][4] As laboratory research has increasingly incorporated more digital sources of data and information from instruments and other sources, labs conducting research today have had to necessarily look at old paper notebook formats as antiquated and incompatible with modern research methods and increasingly digitalized workflows.[2][3]
As a modern substitute for the paper-based laboratory notebook, the ELN at its core intends to similarly provide a means to document experiments, observations, and analyses but in a more organized, consistent, readable, searchable, and shareable way. Because it is software, additional thought has gone into the development of an ELN to allow users to do their research more effectively while integrating with other digital instruments and software solutions to capture and manage data and information closer to real-time. As a result, today's ELNs take many shapes and forms, many of them being developed to address the needs of specific research activities, such as genetic sequencing or chemical analysis.
- https://www.limswiki.org/index.php/LII:The_Application_of_Informatics_to_Scientific_Work:_Laboratory_Informatics_for_Newbies#Expanding_the_research_team
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197872/
- https://www.nature.com/articles/s41596-021-00645-8
- https://ijdc.net/ijdc/article/view/10.1.163
- https://datamanagement.hms.harvard.edu/news/finding-right-electronic-lab-notebook-corey-lab
- https://eln.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/825/2019/09/Output-Final-ELN-Survey-Report-September-2019.pdf
- https://web.archive.org/web/20231208184311/https://astrixinc.com/best-practices-for-electronic-laboratory-notebook-implementation-in-rd-labs/
- https://www.monash.edu/researchinfrastructure/eresearch/capabilities/electronic-lab-notebook/about/why-switch
- https://iupui.libguides.com/IUSMELNToolkit/OrganizingNotebook
- https://www.pistoiaalliance.org/news/seed-project-unlocks-value-of-data-in-electronic-lab-notebooks/
- https://research.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/RCT%20content/ReaDI%20Program/tutorial_LabNotebook_V9.pdf
- https://www.rockefeller.edu/markus-library/uploads/www.rockefeller.edu/sites/207/2019/05/Electronic-Notebooks-CCTS.pdf
Pairing a LIMS and ELN together
Conclusion
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Holmes, F.L.; Renn, J.; Rheinberger, H.-J., ed. (2003). "Introduction". Reworking the Bench - Research Notebooks in the History of Science. Archimedes - New Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology. 7. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. vii–xv. doi:10.1007/0-306-48152-9. ISBN 9780306481529.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Nussbeck, Sara Y; Weil, Philipp; Menzel, Julia; Marzec, Bartlomiej; Lorberg, Kai; Schwappach, Blanche (2014). "The laboratory notebook in the 21 st century: The electronic laboratory notebook would enhance good scientific practice and increase research productivity" (in en). EMBO reports 15 (6): 631–634. doi:10.15252/embr.201338358. ISSN 1469-221X. PMC PMC4197872. PMID 24833749. https://www.embopress.org/doi/10.15252/embr.201338358.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Dirnagl, Ulrich; Przesdzing, Ingo (4 January 2016). "A pocket guide to electronic laboratory notebooks in the academic life sciences" (in en). F1000Research 5: 2. doi:10.12688/f1000research.7628.1. ISSN 2046-1402. PMC PMC4722687. PMID 26835004. https://f1000research.com/articles/5-2/v1.
- ↑ Hunter, Philip (1 September 2017). "The reproducibility “crisis”: Reaction to replication crisis should not stifle innovation" (in en). EMBO reports 18 (9): 1493–1496. doi:10.15252/embr.201744876. ISSN 1469-221X. PMC PMC5579390. PMID 28794201. https://www.embopress.org/doi/10.15252/embr.201744876.
