|
|
| (14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 8: |
Line 8: |
| ==Sandbox begins below== | | ==Sandbox begins below== |
| <div class="nonumtoc">__TOC__</div> | | <div class="nonumtoc">__TOC__</div> |
| [[File:|right|450px]]
| |
| '''Title''': ''What types of testing occur within an animal feed testing laboratory?''
| |
|
| |
| '''Author for citation''': Shawn E. Douglas
| |
|
| |
| '''License for content''': [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International]
| |
|
| |
| '''Publication date''': June 2024
| |
|
| |
| ==Introduction==
| |
|
| |
| This brief topical article will ...
| |
|
| |
| '''Note''': Any citation leading to a software vendor's site is not to be considered a recommendation for that vendor. The citation should however still stand as a representational example of what vendors are implementing in their systems.
| |
|
| |
| ==Blah blah==
| |
| A feed testing [[laboratory]] can operate within a number of different production, research and development (R&D; academic and industry), and [[public health]] contexts. They can<ref name="WardObtain24">{{cite web |url=https://animal.ifas.ufl.edu/media/animalifasufledu/dairy-website/ruminant-nutrition-symposium/archives/12.-WardRNS2024.pdf |format=PDF |author=Ward, R. |title=Obtaining value from a feed/forage lab engagement |work=Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium |date=27 February 2024 |accessdate=28 May 2024}}</ref>:
| |
|
| |
| *act as a third-party consultant, interpreting analytical data;
| |
| *provide research and development support for new and revised formulations;
| |
| *provide analytical support for nutrition and contaminant determinations;
| |
| *provide development support for analytical methods;
| |
| *ensure [[Quality (business)|quality]] to specifications, accreditor standards, and regulations;
| |
| *develop informative databases and data libraries for researchers;
| |
| *manage in-house and remote sample collection, labeling, and registration, including on farms; and
| |
| *report accurate and timely results to stakeholders, including those responsible for monitoring public health.
| |
|
| |
| This wide variety of roles within these major contexts highlights several aspects of the labs operating in the animal feed sector. First, like the more human-based food and beverage industry, the types of testing will vary based upon the context. From R&D and pre-production optimization and [[quality assurance]] (QA) to production and post-production [[quality control]] (QC) and regulatory safety, analytical workflows can differ, sometimes significantly, in the food and beverage industry.<ref name="DouglasFoodBevTest22">{{cite web |url=https://www.limswiki.org/index.php/LIMS_Q%26A:What_types_of_testing_occur_within_a_food_and_beverage_laboratory%3F |title=LIMS Q&A:What types of testing occur within a food and beverage laboratory? |author=Douglas, S.E. |work=LIMSwiki |date=August 2022 |accessdate=11 June 2024}}</ref> This is rarely different for animal feed.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| further highlights the already obvious cross-disciplinary nature of analyzing animal feed ingredients and products, and interpreting the resulting data. The human [[Biology|biological]] sciences, [[Veterinary medicine|veterinary sciences]], [[environmental science]]s, [[chemistry]], [[microbiology]], [[radiochemistry]], [[botany]], [[epidemiology]], and more may be involved within a given animal feed analysis laboratory.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Schnepf |first=Anne |last2=Hille |first2=Katja |last3=van Mark |first3=Gesine |last4=Winkelmann |first4=Tristan |last5=Remm |first5=Karen |last6=Kunze |first6=Katrin |last7=Velleuer |first7=Reinhard |last8=Kreienbrock |first8=Lothar |date=2024-02-06 |title=Basis for a One Health Approach—Inventory of Routine Data Collections on Zoonotic Diseases in Lower Saxony, Germany |url=https://www.mdpi.com/2813-0227/4/1/7 |journal=Zoonotic Diseases |language=en |volume=4 |issue=1 |pages=57–73 |doi=10.3390/zoonoticdis4010007 |issn=2813-0227}}</ref><ref name="PFPLSWHumanAnim18">{{cite web |url=https://www.aphl.org/programs/food_safety/APHL%20Documents/LBPM_Dec2018.pdf |format=PDF |title=Human and Animal Food Testing Laboratories Best Practices Manual |author=Partnership for Food Protection Laboratory Science Workgroup |date=December 2018 |accessdate=28 May 2024}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last=Wood |first=Hannah |last2=O'Connor |first2=Annette |last3=Sargeant |first3=Jan |last4=Glanville |first4=Julie |date=2018-12 |title=Information retrieval for systematic reviews in food and feed topics: A narrative review |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jrsm.1289 |journal=Research Synthesis Methods |language=en |volume=9 |issue=4 |pages=527–539 |doi=10.1002/jrsm.1289 |issn=1759-2879}}</ref> Given this significant cross-disciplinarity, it's arguably more challenging for software developers to create [[laboratory informatics]] solutions like a [[laboratory information management system]] (LIMS) that have the breadth to cover the production, R&D, and public health contexts of animal feed testing. In fact, an industry lab performing [[quality control]] (QC) work for a company will likely have zero interest in public health-driven reporting functionality (e.g., as per the [[Food and Drug Administration]]'s Animal Food Regulatory Program Standards [AFRPS]<ref name="FDAAFRPS23">{{cite web |url=https://www.fda.gov/media/136030/download?attachment |format=PDF |title=Animal Food Regulatory Program Standards |author=Office of Regulatory Affairs |publisher=U.S. Food and Drug Administration |date=2023 |accessdate=28 May 2024}}</ref>), and a LIMS that focuses on QC [[workflow]]s may be more highly desirable.
| |
|
| |
| ==Conclusion==
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ==References==
| |
| {{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}
| |
|
| |
| <!---Place all category tags here-->
| |
