Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text)
(Updated article of the week text)
 
(195 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''"[[Journal:Defending our public biological databases as a global critical infrastructure|Defending our public biological databases as a global critical infrastructure]]"'''
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig2 Berezin PLoSCompBio23 19-12.png|240px]]</div>
'''"[[Journal:Ten simple rules for managing laboratory information|Ten simple rules for managing laboratory information]]"'''
 
[[Information]] is the cornerstone of [[research]], from experimental data/[[metadata]] and computational processes to complex inventories of reagents and equipment. These 10 simple rules discuss best practices for leveraging [[laboratory information management system]]s (LIMS) to transform this large information load into useful scientific findings. The development of [[mathematical model]]s that can predict the properties of biological systems is the holy grail of [[computational biology]]. Such models can be used to test biological hypotheses, guide the development of biomanufactured products, engineer new systems meeting user-defined specifications, and much more ... ('''[[Journal:Ten simple rules for managing laboratory information|Full article...]]''')<br />


Progress in modern biology is being driven, in part, by the large amounts of freely available data in public resources such as the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC), the world's primary database of biological sequence (and related) [[information]]. INSDC and similar databases have dramatically increased the pace of fundamental biological discovery and enabled a host of innovative therapeutic, diagnostic, and forensic applications. However, as high-value, openly shared resources with a high degree of assumed trust, these repositories share compelling similarities to the early days of the internet. Consequently, as public biological databases continue to increase in size and importance, we expect that they will face the same threats as undefended cyberspace. There is a unique opportunity, before a significant breach and loss of trust occurs, to ensure they evolve with quality and security as a design philosophy rather than costly “retrofitted” mitigations. This perspective article surveys some potential quality assurance and security weaknesses in existing open [[Genomics|genomic]] and [[Proteomics|proteomic]] repositories, describes methods to mitigate the likelihood of both intentional and unintentional errors, and offers recommendations for risk mitigation based on lessons learned from [[cybersecurity]]. ('''[[Journal:Defending our public biological databases as a global critical infrastructure|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
''Recently featured'':
''Recently featured'':
: ▪ [[Journal:Determining the hospital information system (HIS) success rate: Development of a new instrument and case study|Determining the hospital information system (HIS) success rate: Development of a new instrument and case study]]
{{flowlist |
: ▪ [[Journal:Smart information systems in cybersecurity: An ethical analysis|Smart information systems in cybersecurity: An ethical analysis]]
* [[Journal:Hierarchical AI enables global interpretation of culture plates in the era of digital microbiology|Hierarchical AI enables global interpretation of culture plates in the era of digital microbiology]]
: ▪ [[Journal:Chemometric analysis of cannabinoids: Chemotaxonomy and domestication syndrome|Chemometric analysis of cannabinoids: Chemotaxonomy and domestication syndrome]]
* [[Journal:Critical analysis of the impact of AI on the patient–physician relationship: A multi-stakeholder qualitative study|Critical analysis of the impact of AI on the patient–physician relationship: A multi-stakeholder qualitative study]]
* [[Journal:Judgements of research co-created by generative AI: Experimental evidence|Judgements of research co-created by generative AI: Experimental evidence]]
}}

Latest revision as of 18:03, 10 June 2024

Fig2 Berezin PLoSCompBio23 19-12.png

"Ten simple rules for managing laboratory information"

Information is the cornerstone of research, from experimental data/metadata and computational processes to complex inventories of reagents and equipment. These 10 simple rules discuss best practices for leveraging laboratory information management systems (LIMS) to transform this large information load into useful scientific findings. The development of mathematical models that can predict the properties of biological systems is the holy grail of computational biology. Such models can be used to test biological hypotheses, guide the development of biomanufactured products, engineer new systems meeting user-defined specifications, and much more ... (Full article...)

Recently featured: