Difference between revisions of "LIMSWiki:Citation needed"
From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchShawndouglas (talk | contribs) (Created as needed.) |
Shawndouglas (talk | contribs) (Added cat.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
To ensure all LIMSwiki content is verifiable, anyone may question an [[LIMSWiki:Citation guidelines|un-cited claim]] by inserting a <code>{{tl|Citation needed}}</code> tag. | To ensure all LIMSwiki content is verifiable, anyone may question an [[LIMSWiki:Citation guidelines|un-cited claim]] by inserting a <code>{{tl|Citation needed}}</code> tag. | ||
'''Example:''' 65% of people believe in ghosts.<!--{{Citation needed}} begin-->{{fix |link= | '''Example:''' 65% of people believe in ghosts.<!--{{Citation needed}} begin-->{{fix |link=LIMSWiki:Citation needed#Citation needed |text=citation needed |class=Template-Fact }}<!--{{Citation needed}} end--> | ||
* Exercise caution before relying upon unsourced claims. | * Exercise caution before relying upon unsourced claims. | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
[[Category:LIMSwiki help documentation]] | |||
Latest revision as of 19:44, 29 May 2013
The {{Citation needed}} template aims to promote accountable discourse.
 |
A complete version of this documentation is provided at Template:Citation needed. |
To ensure all LIMSwiki content is verifiable, anyone may question an un-cited claim by inserting a {{Citation needed}} tag.
Example: 65% of people believe in ghosts.[citation needed]
- Exercise caution before relying upon unsourced claims.
- If you can provide a reliable source for the claim, please make the effort and replace the "Citation needed" template with enough information to locate the source. You may leave the copyediting to someone else, or follow by Wikipedia's example here: Wikipedia:Citing sources
- If someone tagged your contributions with
{{Citation needed}}and you disagree, discuss the matter on the article's discussion page. - Controversial, poorly-sourced claims in biographies of living people should be deleted immediately.
