Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"
From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchShawndouglas (talk | contribs) (Updated article of the week text) |
Shawndouglas (talk | contribs) (Updated article of the week text.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File: | <div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig1 Jin BMCMedInfoDecMak21 21.png|240px]]</div> | ||
'''"[[Journal: | '''"[[Journal:Development and implementation of an LIS-based validation system for autoverification toward zero defects in the automated reporting of laboratory test results|Development and implementation of an LIS-based validation system for autoverification toward zero defects in the automated reporting of laboratory test results]]"''' | ||
For [[laboratory informatics]] applications, [[Software verification and validation|validation]] of the autoverification function is one of the critical steps to confirm its effectiveness before use. It is crucial to verify whether the programmed algorithm follows the expected logic and produces the expected results. This process has always relied on the assessment of human–machine consistency and is mostly a manually recorded and time-consuming activity with inherent subjectivity and arbitrariness that cannot guarantee a comprehensive, timely, and continuous effectiveness evaluation of the autoverification function. To overcome these inherent limitations, we independently developed and implemented a [[laboratory information system]] (LIS)-based validation system for autoverification. We developed a correctness verification and integrity validation method (hereinafter referred to as the "new method") in the form of a human–machine dialog ... ('''[[Journal:Development and implementation of an LIS-based validation system for autoverification toward zero defects in the automated reporting of laboratory test results|Full article...]]''')<br /> | |||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
''Recently featured'': | ''Recently featured'': | ||
{{flowlist | | {{flowlist | | ||
* [[Journal:Emerging and established trends to support secure health information exchange|Emerging and established trends to support secure health information exchange]] | |||
* [[Journal:Security and privacy in cloud-based eHealth systems|Security and privacy in cloud-based eHealth systems]] | * [[Journal:Security and privacy in cloud-based eHealth systems|Security and privacy in cloud-based eHealth systems]] | ||
* [[Journal:Using interactive digital notebooks for bioscience and informatics education|Using interactive digital notebooks for bioscience and informatics education]] | * [[Journal:Using interactive digital notebooks for bioscience and informatics education|Using interactive digital notebooks for bioscience and informatics education]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 15:22, 28 March 2022
For laboratory informatics applications, validation of the autoverification function is one of the critical steps to confirm its effectiveness before use. It is crucial to verify whether the programmed algorithm follows the expected logic and produces the expected results. This process has always relied on the assessment of human–machine consistency and is mostly a manually recorded and time-consuming activity with inherent subjectivity and arbitrariness that cannot guarantee a comprehensive, timely, and continuous effectiveness evaluation of the autoverification function. To overcome these inherent limitations, we independently developed and implemented a laboratory information system (LIS)-based validation system for autoverification. We developed a correctness verification and integrity validation method (hereinafter referred to as the "new method") in the form of a human–machine dialog ... (Full article...)
Recently featured:
