Difference between revisions of "User:Shawndouglas/sandbox/sublevel1"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
Often referred to as simply a medical or clinical laboratory, the medical diagnostics lab performs tests on clinical specimens in order to get information about the health of a patient as it pertains to the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of disease.<ref name="MedLabTech">{{cite book |title=Textbook of Medical Laboratory Technology |chapter=Chapter 1: Laboratory |author=Sood, R. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hpNhAQAACAAJ |pages=01–28 |year=2006 |publisher=Jaypee Brothers Publishers |isbn=818061591X}}</ref> An additional definition is provided by the [[Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments]] (CLIA) program, as "a facility that performs testing on materials derived from the human body for the purpose of providing information for the diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of any disease or impairment of, or assessment of the health of, human beings."<ref name="CLIACDCLab">{{cite web |url=https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/CLIA/downloads/HowObtainCertificateofWaiver.pdf |format=PDF |title=CLIA - How to Obtain a CLIA Certificate of Waiver |publisher=Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |date=March 2019 |accessdate=18 November 2021}}</ref>
====1.1.1 Pathology====
[[File:Blood clot.jpg|right|thumb|Pathological view of a blood clot]]Pathology is at the heart of a medical laboratory's operations. In the context of modern medical treatment, the laboratory practice of pathology involves analytical workflow, which falls within the contemporary medical field of "general pathology," and the associated determination of the causes and effects of disease and other medical ailments. General pathology is broadly composed of a number of distinct but inter-related medical specialties that involve the analysis of tissue, cell, and body fluid specimens to better understand the cause, pathogenesis, morphologic changes, and clinical manifestations of a disease.<ref name="KumarRobbins09">{{cite book |title=Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease, Professional Edition |editor=Kumar, V.; Abbas, A.; Fausto, N.; Aster, J. |publisher=Saunders Elsevier |edition=8th |year=2010 |isbn=9781416031215}}</ref> In common medical practice, general pathology is mostly concerned with analyzing known clinical abnormalities that are markers or precursors for both infectious and non-infectious disease and is conducted by experts in one of two major specialties: [[anatomical pathology]] and [[clinical pathology]]. Additional subspecialties of pathology may further specialize in specific diseases (such as cancer) or situational focuses (such as cause of death).


At a basic level, the medical laboratory, whether chemistry or pathology, operates like many other analytical testing laboratories. However, there are a few nuances between the medical laboratory and other analytical laboratories. Aside from handling human and animal specimens, one of these differences is the need to have a specific unidirectional workflow. This is intended to both minimize the risk of biohazard contamination and to establish assurance that sample cross contamination is minimized.<ref name="ChenGood09">{{cite journal |url=https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5806a1.htm |title=Good Laboratory Practices for Molecular Genetic Testing for Heritable Diseases and Conditions |author=Chen, B.; Gagnon, M.; Shahangian, S. et al. |journal=Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report |volume=58 |issue=RR06 |pages=1–29 |date=12 June 2009 |accessdate=18 November 2021}}</ref><ref name="VianaGood11">{{cite book |title=Wide Spectra of Quality Control |chapter=Chapter 3: Good Clinical Laboratory Practice (GCLP) for Molecular Based Tests Used in Diagnostic Laboratories |author=Viana, R.V.; Wallis, C.L. |editor=Isin, A. |url=https://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/23728.pdf |format=PDF |pages=29–52 |year=2011 |publisher=InTech |isbn=9789533076836}}</ref> Another major difference concerns the regulations governing the management of patient data (e.g., the [[Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act]] [HIPAA] in the U.S. and General Data Protection Regulation [GDPR] in Europe). This creates a significant challenge not generally experienced by other types of analytical laboratories.
'''1.1.1.1 Anatomical vs. clinical pathology'''


In most parts of the world, the medical laboratory is either attached to a [[hospital]], performing tests on their patients, or acts as a private (or public) laboratory that receives analysis requests and samples from physicians, insurance companies, clinical research sites, and other health clinics for analysis. In cases where a particularly specialized analysis is required and a standard medical laboratory is not equipped to handle it, a research laboratory with the appropriate equipment and expertise may be employed. In other cases, a laboratory may decide it's simply more cost effective to contract more specialized, less common analyses out to specialized medical labs rather than heavily invest in the equipment and training to perform such analyses. Examples include the molecular diagnostics and cytogenetics laboratory, which provide diagnoses and treatment options for genetic or [[cancer]]-related disorders.
Anatomical (or "anatomic") pathology is a medical specialty of pathology that is concerned with the gross, microscopic, chemical, immunologic, and molecular examination of organs, tissues, and whole bodies (as in autopsy) to determine the presence of disease. Its subspecialties include surgical pathology (e.g., neuropathology, dermatopathology, etc.), cytopathology, and forensic pathology.<ref name="AdelmanForensic09">{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=x5FftcZOv1UC&pg=PA3 |title=Forensic Medicine |author=Adelman, H.C. |publisher=Infobase Publishing |pages=3–4 |year=2009 |isbn=1438103816}}</ref> Clinical pathology, however, is concerned with the diagnosis of disease based on the laboratory analysis of bodily fluids such as blood, urine, and tissues using the tools of chemistry, microbiology, [[hematology]], and molecular analysis. Its subspecialties include hematopathology, immunopathology, and molecular pathology.<ref name="AdelmanForensic09" /> Both anatomical and clinical pathologists work in close collaboration with clinical scientists (i.e., clinical biochemists, clinical microbiologists, etc.), medical technologists, surgeons, [[hospital]] administrators, and referring physicians to ensure the accuracy and optimal utilization of laboratory testing. Yet some argue the distinction between anatomic and clinical pathology is increasingly blurred by the introduction of molecular technologies that require new expertise and the need to provide patients and referring physicians with integrated diagnostic reports.<ref name="FriedbergEvolv13">{{cite web |url=https://scholarlycommons.libraryinfo.bhs.org/all_works/7637/ |work=2013 Summer Anatomic Pathology Conference |title=Evolving Changes in Health Care and Implications for Pathology and Laboratory Practice |publisher=Florida Society of Pathologists |author=Friedberg, R. |quote=The advent of molecular pathology and molecular imaging tools only serves to further blur the distinction between anatomic and clinical pathology... |date=July 2013 |accessdate=18 November 2021}}</ref><ref name="PaxtonAllFor11">{{cite web |url=http://www.captodayonline.com/Archives/0211/0211a_cp_ap.html |title=All for one—unifying CP and AP data |author=Paxton, A. |work=CAP Today |quote=Traditionally, CP systems are based on discrete data elements while AP systems are based on blocks of text. But that distinction is starting to blur, because AP is moving to synoptic reporting, and that includes the creation of discrete data components as well as textual reporting |publisher=College of American Pathologists |date=February 2011 |accessdate=18 November 2021}}</ref>


Like other analytical laboratories, regulations, laws, and standards typically drive how vital aspects of the laboratory operate. In the United States, clinical laboratories are primarily regulated by the [[United States Department of Health and Human Services|Department of Health and Human Services]]. Inside that infrastructure are sub-entities like the [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]] (CDC) and the [[Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services]] (CMS) to apply standards and regulations through their respective Laboratory Quality Assurance and Standardization Programs, and the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments.<ref name="DHHS_HHS19">{{cite web |url=https://www.hhs.gov/about/agencies/orgchart/index.html |title=HHS Organizational Chart |publisher=U.S. Department of Health & Human Services |date=31 December 2019 |accessdate=18 November 2021}}</ref><ref name="CDCLaboratory17">{{cite web |url=https://www.cdc.gov/labstandards/ |title=Laboratory Quality Assurance and Standardization Programs |publisher=Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |date=25 July 2017 |accessdate=18 November 2021}}</ref><ref name="CMS_CLIA">{{cite web |url=https://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/legislation/clia |title=Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) |publisher=Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services |date=16 November 2021 |accessdate=18 November 2021}}</ref> Although generally not as strict as the regulations regarding pharmaceutical and diagnostic manufacturers, the regulations affecting the medical laboratory nonetheless act as a significant hurdle to managing the overall operations of the laboratory, from acquiring customers and samples, to testing, reporting results, and handling billing for the completed tests.
Regardless, some differences between anatomical and clinical pathology remain distinct<ref name="ParkAnatom12">{{cite journal |title=Anatomic Pathology Laboratory Information Systems: A Review |journal=Advances in Anatomic Pathology |author=Park, S.L.; Pantanowitz, L.; Sharma, G. et al. |volume=19 |issue=2 |page=81–96 |year=2012 |doi=10.1097/PAP.0b013e318248b787 |pmid=22313836}}</ref>:


Internationally, regulatory bodies vary from country to country. However, organizations like the not-for-profit Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)<ref name="CLSIAbout">{{cite web |url=https://clsi.org/about/ |title=About CLSI |publisher=Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute |accessdate=18 November 2021}}</ref> and associations like the Research Quality Association (RQA)<ref name="RQAAbout">{{cite web |url=https://www.therqa.com/about/ |title=What is RQA? |publisher=Research Quality Association |accessdate=18 November 2021}}</ref> exist to promote a more global approach to regulations and guidance affecting medical diagnostic and research laboratories. Additionally, a set of Good Clinical Laboratory Practice standards—originally developed in 2002 and since adopted by the World Health Organisation (WHO), non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and research institutions worldwide—provide guidance on implementing laboratory practices that are critical for laboratory operations around the world.<ref name="RQAGCLP">{{cite web |url=https://www.therqa.com/resources/publications/booklets/good-clinical-laboratory-practice-booklet/ |title=Good Clinical Laboratory Practice (GCLP) |publisher=Research Quality Association |date=January 2012 |accessdate=18 November 2021}}</ref><ref name="GCLPEzzelle">{{cite journal |title=Guidelines on Good Clinical Laboratory Practice - Bridging Operations between Research and Clinical Research Laboratories |author=Ezzelle, J.; Rodriguez-Chavez, I.R.; Darden, J.M. et al. |journal=Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis |volume=46 |issue=1 |pages=18–29 |year=2008 |doi=10.1016/j.jpba.2007.10.010 |pmid=18037599 |pmc=PMC2213906}}</ref>
* Specific dictionary-driven tests are found in clinical pathology environments, but not so much in anatomic pathology environments.
* Ordered anatomic pathology tests typically require more [[information]] than clinical pathology tests.
* A single anatomic pathology order may be comprised of several tissues from several organs; clinical pathology orders usually do not.
* Anatomic pathology specimen collection may be a procedural, multi-step process, while clinical pathology specimen collection is routinely more simple.
 
The differences between the two may appear to be small, but a differentiation in laboratory workflow between the two is apparent, to the point that developers of [[laboratory information system]]s (LIS) and anatomic pathology computer systems used in the pathology fields have created different functionality for them. Specimen collection, receipt, and tracking; work distribution; and report generation may vary–sometimes significantly–between the two, requiring targeted functionality in the utilized software.<ref name="HenricksLIS12Arch">{{cite web |url=http://www.pathinformatics.pitt.edu/sites/default/files/2012Powerpoints/01HenricksTues.pdf |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150910050825/http://www.pathinformatics.pitt.edu/sites/default/files/2012Powerpoints/01HenricksTues.pdf |format=PDF |title=LIS Basics: CP and AP LIS Design and Operations |work=Pathology Informatics 2012 |author=Henricks, W.H. |date=09 October 2012 |archivedate=10 September 2015 |accessdate=18 November 2021}}</ref><ref name="CliffordTheEvo11">{{cite web |url=https://www.mlo-online.com/home/article/13004085/the-evolving-lis-needs-to-be-everything-for-todays-laboratories |title=The evolving LIS needs to be "everything" for today's laboratories |author=Clifford, L.-J. |work=Medical Laboratory Observer |publisher=Endeavor Business Media, LLC |date=August 2011 |accessdate=18 November 2021}}</ref>
 
'''1.1.1.2 Forensic pathology'''
 
Typically associated with a medical examiner or coroner, forensic pathology is focused on identifying and determining the cause of death of an individual. This includes not only the analysis of wounds and injuries but also full tissue specimens, identifying traumas—as well as chemical, biological, and solid foreign bodies and contaminates—that may have played a role in the individual's death. Anatomic pathology plays an important part of the examiner's analyses—represented by the forensic pathologist's required training—though clinical pathology also plays a role.<ref name="PrahlowIntro">{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rF1WTiX0nHEC&pg=PA35 |chapter=Chapter 3: Introduction to Forensic Pathology |title=Forensic Pathology for Police, Death Investigators, Attorneys, and Forensic Scientists |author=Prahlow, J. |publisher=Humana Press |pages=35–48 |year=2010 |isbn=9781588299758 |doi=10.1007/978-1-59745-404-9}}</ref> Outside the gross examination of a body, the forensic pathologist will rely on the lab to conduct a variety of analyses. Whole organs and slides containing cross-sectional slivers of organs, as well as blood, urine, bile, and vitreous humor may be analyzed for toxicology, DNA typing, infectious diseases, disorders, or other chemical tests.<ref name="AACCTheWorld19">{{cite web |url=https://www.testing.com/articles/forensic-testing/ |title=The World of Forensic Laboratory Testing |work=Testing.com |publisher=OneCare Media |date=09 November 2021 |accessdate=18 November 2021}}</ref> In particular, maintaining chain of custody for such specimens is vital to ensure analyses are correct and evidence is not compromised. Though a medical laboratory, the forensic pathology laboratory isn't held to the same CLIA standards; they must be accredited by a related organization such as [[The American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board]] to ensure the lab operates at prescribed standards.<ref name="AACCTheWorld19" />


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}

Revision as of 18:54, 21 January 2022

1.1.1 Pathology

Pathological view of a blood clot

Pathology is at the heart of a medical laboratory's operations. In the context of modern medical treatment, the laboratory practice of pathology involves analytical workflow, which falls within the contemporary medical field of "general pathology," and the associated determination of the causes and effects of disease and other medical ailments. General pathology is broadly composed of a number of distinct but inter-related medical specialties that involve the analysis of tissue, cell, and body fluid specimens to better understand the cause, pathogenesis, morphologic changes, and clinical manifestations of a disease.[1] In common medical practice, general pathology is mostly concerned with analyzing known clinical abnormalities that are markers or precursors for both infectious and non-infectious disease and is conducted by experts in one of two major specialties: anatomical pathology and clinical pathology. Additional subspecialties of pathology may further specialize in specific diseases (such as cancer) or situational focuses (such as cause of death).

1.1.1.1 Anatomical vs. clinical pathology

Anatomical (or "anatomic") pathology is a medical specialty of pathology that is concerned with the gross, microscopic, chemical, immunologic, and molecular examination of organs, tissues, and whole bodies (as in autopsy) to determine the presence of disease. Its subspecialties include surgical pathology (e.g., neuropathology, dermatopathology, etc.), cytopathology, and forensic pathology.[2] Clinical pathology, however, is concerned with the diagnosis of disease based on the laboratory analysis of bodily fluids such as blood, urine, and tissues using the tools of chemistry, microbiology, hematology, and molecular analysis. Its subspecialties include hematopathology, immunopathology, and molecular pathology.[2] Both anatomical and clinical pathologists work in close collaboration with clinical scientists (i.e., clinical biochemists, clinical microbiologists, etc.), medical technologists, surgeons, hospital administrators, and referring physicians to ensure the accuracy and optimal utilization of laboratory testing. Yet some argue the distinction between anatomic and clinical pathology is increasingly blurred by the introduction of molecular technologies that require new expertise and the need to provide patients and referring physicians with integrated diagnostic reports.[3][4]

Regardless, some differences between anatomical and clinical pathology remain distinct[5]:

  • Specific dictionary-driven tests are found in clinical pathology environments, but not so much in anatomic pathology environments.
  • Ordered anatomic pathology tests typically require more information than clinical pathology tests.
  • A single anatomic pathology order may be comprised of several tissues from several organs; clinical pathology orders usually do not.
  • Anatomic pathology specimen collection may be a procedural, multi-step process, while clinical pathology specimen collection is routinely more simple.

The differences between the two may appear to be small, but a differentiation in laboratory workflow between the two is apparent, to the point that developers of laboratory information systems (LIS) and anatomic pathology computer systems used in the pathology fields have created different functionality for them. Specimen collection, receipt, and tracking; work distribution; and report generation may vary–sometimes significantly–between the two, requiring targeted functionality in the utilized software.[6][7]

1.1.1.2 Forensic pathology

Typically associated with a medical examiner or coroner, forensic pathology is focused on identifying and determining the cause of death of an individual. This includes not only the analysis of wounds and injuries but also full tissue specimens, identifying traumas—as well as chemical, biological, and solid foreign bodies and contaminates—that may have played a role in the individual's death. Anatomic pathology plays an important part of the examiner's analyses—represented by the forensic pathologist's required training—though clinical pathology also plays a role.[8] Outside the gross examination of a body, the forensic pathologist will rely on the lab to conduct a variety of analyses. Whole organs and slides containing cross-sectional slivers of organs, as well as blood, urine, bile, and vitreous humor may be analyzed for toxicology, DNA typing, infectious diseases, disorders, or other chemical tests.[9] In particular, maintaining chain of custody for such specimens is vital to ensure analyses are correct and evidence is not compromised. Though a medical laboratory, the forensic pathology laboratory isn't held to the same CLIA standards; they must be accredited by a related organization such as The American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board to ensure the lab operates at prescribed standards.[9]

References

  1. Kumar, V.; Abbas, A.; Fausto, N.; Aster, J., ed. (2010). Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease, Professional Edition (8th ed.). Saunders Elsevier. ISBN 9781416031215. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 Adelman, H.C. (2009). Forensic Medicine. Infobase Publishing. pp. 3–4. ISBN 1438103816. https://books.google.com/books?id=x5FftcZOv1UC&pg=PA3. 
  3. Friedberg, R. (July 2013). "Evolving Changes in Health Care and Implications for Pathology and Laboratory Practice". 2013 Summer Anatomic Pathology Conference. Florida Society of Pathologists. https://scholarlycommons.libraryinfo.bhs.org/all_works/7637/. Retrieved 18 November 2021. "The advent of molecular pathology and molecular imaging tools only serves to further blur the distinction between anatomic and clinical pathology..." 
  4. Paxton, A. (February 2011). "All for one—unifying CP and AP data". CAP Today. College of American Pathologists. http://www.captodayonline.com/Archives/0211/0211a_cp_ap.html. Retrieved 18 November 2021. "Traditionally, CP systems are based on discrete data elements while AP systems are based on blocks of text. But that distinction is starting to blur, because AP is moving to synoptic reporting, and that includes the creation of discrete data components as well as textual reporting" 
  5. Park, S.L.; Pantanowitz, L.; Sharma, G. et al. (2012). "Anatomic Pathology Laboratory Information Systems: A Review". Advances in Anatomic Pathology 19 (2): 81–96. doi:10.1097/PAP.0b013e318248b787. PMID 22313836. 
  6. Henricks, W.H. (9 October 2012). "LIS Basics: CP and AP LIS Design and Operations" (PDF). Pathology Informatics 2012. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. https://web.archive.org/web/20150910050825/http://www.pathinformatics.pitt.edu/sites/default/files/2012Powerpoints/01HenricksTues.pdf. Retrieved 18 November 2021. 
  7. Clifford, L.-J. (August 2011). "The evolving LIS needs to be "everything" for today's laboratories". Medical Laboratory Observer. Endeavor Business Media, LLC. https://www.mlo-online.com/home/article/13004085/the-evolving-lis-needs-to-be-everything-for-todays-laboratories. Retrieved 18 November 2021. 
  8. Prahlow, J. (2010). "Chapter 3: Introduction to Forensic Pathology". Forensic Pathology for Police, Death Investigators, Attorneys, and Forensic Scientists. Humana Press. pp. 35–48. doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-404-9. ISBN 9781588299758. https://books.google.com/books?id=rF1WTiX0nHEC&pg=PA35. 
  9. 9.0 9.1 "The World of Forensic Laboratory Testing". Testing.com. OneCare Media. 9 November 2021. https://www.testing.com/articles/forensic-testing/. Retrieved 18 November 2021.