Difference between revisions of "Template:Article of the week"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Updated article of the week text)
(Updated article of the week text)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig1 Brandt DataSciJourn21 20-1.png|240px]]</div>//-->
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">[[File:Fig8 Lee Sustain20 13-1.png|240px]]</div>
'''"[[Journal:Towards a risk catalog for data management plans|Towards a risk catalog for data management plans]]"'''
'''"[[Journal:Towards a risk catalog for data management plans|Towards a risk catalog for data management plans]]"'''


Although [[Information management|data management]] and its careful planning are not new topics, there is little published research on [[Risk management|risk mitigation]] in data management plans (DMPs). We consider it a problem that DMPs do not include a structured approach for the [[Risk assessment|identification]] or mitigation of risks, because it would instill confidence and trust in the data and its stewards, and foster the successful conduction of data-generating projects, which often are funded research projects. In this paper, we present a lightweight approach for identifying general risk in DMPs. We introduce an initial version of a generic risk catalog for funded research and similar projects. By analyzing a selection of 13 DMPs for projects from multiple disciplines published in the ''Research Ideas and Outcomes'' (''RIO'') journal, we demonstrate that our approach is applicable to DMPs and transferable to multiple institutional constellations. As a result, the effort for integrating risk management in data management planning can be reduced. ('''[[Journal:Towards a risk catalog for data management plans|Full article...]]''')<br />
[[Personal health record]]s (PHRs) have many benefits for things such as [[Public health surveillance|health surveillance]], [[Epidemiology|epidemiological surveillance]], self-control, links to various services, [[public health]] and health management, and international surveillance. The implementation of an international standard for interoperability is essential to accessing PHRs. In Taiwan, the nationwide exchange platform for [[electronic medical record]]s (EMRs) has been in use for many years. The [[Health Level 7|Health Level Seven International]] (HL7) Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) was used as the standard for those EMRs. However, the complication of implementing CDA became a barrier for many [[hospital]]s to realizing standard EMRs. In this study, we implemented a [[Health Level 7#Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR)|Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources]] (FHIR)-based PHR transformation process, including a user interface module to review the contents of PHRs. ('''[[Journal:Towards a risk catalog for data management plans|Full article...]]''')<br />
<br />
<br />
''Recently featured'':
''Recently featured'':
{{flowlist |
{{flowlist |
* [[Journal:Towards a risk catalog for data management plans|Towards a risk catalog for data management plans]]
* [[Journal:Kadi4Mat: A research data infrastructure for materials science|Kadi4Mat: A research data infrastructure for materials science]]
* [[Journal:Kadi4Mat: A research data infrastructure for materials science|Kadi4Mat: A research data infrastructure for materials science]]
* [[Journal:Making data and workflows findable for machines|Making data and workflows findable for machines]]
* [[Journal:Making data and workflows findable for machines|Making data and workflows findable for machines]]
* [[Journal:Timely delivery of laboratory efficiency information, Part I: Developing an interactive turnaround time dashboard at a high-volume laboratory|Timely delivery of laboratory efficiency information, Part I: Developing an interactive turnaround time dashboard at a high-volume laboratory]]
}}
}}

Revision as of 17:07, 3 January 2022

Fig8 Lee Sustain20 13-1.png

"Towards a risk catalog for data management plans"

Personal health records (PHRs) have many benefits for things such as health surveillance, epidemiological surveillance, self-control, links to various services, public health and health management, and international surveillance. The implementation of an international standard for interoperability is essential to accessing PHRs. In Taiwan, the nationwide exchange platform for electronic medical records (EMRs) has been in use for many years. The Health Level Seven International (HL7) Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) was used as the standard for those EMRs. However, the complication of implementing CDA became a barrier for many hospitals to realizing standard EMRs. In this study, we implemented a Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR)-based PHR transformation process, including a user interface module to review the contents of PHRs. (Full article...)

Recently featured: