Difference between revisions of "File:Fig3 Husen DataSciJourn2017 16-1.png"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(Added summary.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Summary==
{{Information
|Description='''Figure 2.''' Pie-chart showing the number of repositories that are recommended by 1 to 17 organizations. The highest number of recommendations received is 12.
|Source={{cite journal |title=Recommended versus certified repositories: Mind the gap |journal=Data Science Journal |author=Husen, S.E.; de Wilde, Z.G.; de Waard, A.; Cousijn, H. |volume=16 |issue=1 |pages=42 |year=2017 |doi=10.5334/dsj-2017-042}}
|Author=Husen, S.E.; de Wilde, Z.G.; de Waard, A.; Cousijn, H.
|Date=2017
|Permission=[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International]
}}
== Licensing ==
== Licensing ==
{{cc-by-4.0}}
{{cc-by-4.0}}

Latest revision as of 15:01, 18 October 2017

Summary

Description

Figure 2. Pie-chart showing the number of repositories that are recommended by 1 to 17 organizations. The highest number of recommendations received is 12.

Source

Husen, S.E.; de Wilde, Z.G.; de Waard, A.; Cousijn, H. (2017). "Recommended versus certified repositories: Mind the gap". Data Science Journal 16 (1): 42. doi:10.5334/dsj-2017-042. 

Date

2017

Author

Husen, S.E.; de Wilde, Z.G.; de Waard, A.; Cousijn, H.

Permission
(Reusing this file)

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Other versions


Licensing

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current15:01, 18 October 2017Thumbnail for version as of 15:01, 18 October 2017640 × 436 (31 KB)Shawndouglas (talk | contribs)

Metadata