Difference between revisions of "File:Fig2 OConnor BMCInformatics2010 11-12.jpg"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(Added summary.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Summary==
{{Information
|Description='''Figure 2. Load and query performance.''' Comparisons of load and query times between the HBase and BerkeleyDB backend. (a) Load times for the “1102 GBM” tumor/normal genomes where compared between HBase and BerkeleyDB. Both used a single-threaded approach to better compare relative performance. Both perform similarly but over time the load times for BerkeleyDB increase faster than with HBase. (b) Comparison of querying the 1102 genome database between BerkeleyDB, HBase single threaded, and HBase using MapReduce. Beyond 3M variants BerkeleyDB query times increase dramatically while both query types for HBase perform linearly, with MapReduce consistently exhibiting the best performance.
|Source={{cite journal |url=http://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S12-S2 |title=SeqWare Query Engine: Storing and searching sequence data in the cloud |journal=BMC Informatics |author=O’Connor, Brian D.; Merriman, Barry; Nelson, Stanley F. |volume=11 |issue=12 |pages=S2 |year=2010 |doi=10.1186/1471-2105-11-S12-S2 |issn=1471-2105}}
|Author=O’Connor, Brian D.; Merriman, Barry; Nelson, Stanley F.
|Date=2010
|Permission=[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic]
}}
== Licensing ==
== Licensing ==
{{cc-by-2.0}}
{{cc-by-2.0}}

Latest revision as of 19:42, 28 December 2015

Summary

Description

Figure 2. Load and query performance. Comparisons of load and query times between the HBase and BerkeleyDB backend. (a) Load times for the “1102 GBM” tumor/normal genomes where compared between HBase and BerkeleyDB. Both used a single-threaded approach to better compare relative performance. Both perform similarly but over time the load times for BerkeleyDB increase faster than with HBase. (b) Comparison of querying the 1102 genome database between BerkeleyDB, HBase single threaded, and HBase using MapReduce. Beyond 3M variants BerkeleyDB query times increase dramatically while both query types for HBase perform linearly, with MapReduce consistently exhibiting the best performance.

Source

O’Connor, Brian D.; Merriman, Barry; Nelson, Stanley F. (2010). "SeqWare Query Engine: Storing and searching sequence data in the cloud". BMC Informatics 11 (12): S2. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-S12-S2. ISSN 1471-2105. http://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S12-S2. 

Date

2010

Author

O’Connor, Brian D.; Merriman, Barry; Nelson, Stanley F.

Permission
(Reusing this file)

Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

Other versions


Licensing

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current19:41, 28 December 2015Thumbnail for version as of 19:41, 28 December 2015600 × 570 (59 KB)Shawndouglas (talk | contribs)

Metadata