Difference between revisions of "User talk:Kruti"

From LIMSWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Welcome!)
 
(Added comments.)
Line 10: Line 10:


Again, welcome and have fun! [[User:Admin|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin|talk]]) 12:43, 16 September 2014 (EDT)
Again, welcome and have fun! [[User:Admin|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin|talk]]) 12:43, 16 September 2014 (EDT)
==[[Krishagni Solutions Pvt. Ltd.]]==
As stated in the original user terms, we do not allow any marketing language at all. Additionally, we like to retain the history of a product. For those reasons I removed the marketing language and re-added the original history. I kept other changes made but reworded them to meet our wiki's standards. I also re-added information about the lack of a license. The truth is your company [http://www.catissueplus.org/feature/free-open-source does not list] the ''specific'' license your software is available under (Creative Commons, MIT, etc.) To the benefit of your users, I strongly recommend you update your website to clearly state what specific license the software falls under.
Otherwise, everything else looks OK. Thanks! [[User:Shawndouglas|Shawn Douglas]] ([[User talk:Shawndouglas|talk]]) 14:20, 10 October 2014 (EDT)

Revision as of 18:20, 10 October 2014

Welcome to LIMSWiki! We hope you will contribute much and well. Please be mindful to make all contributions as accurate as possible.

You will probably want to read the [pages]. Don't hesitate to ask for assistance on the creation of your own page, as well as whatever else you would like to contribute.

We hope that LIMSWiki will become the go-to source for all your information needs regarding everything related to LIMS, whether it be a company, information on a specific industry topic, or even just a definition of a simple abbreviation!! Stay ahead of the game, and be informed.

Again, welcome and have fun! Admin (talk) 12:43, 16 September 2014 (EDT)

Krishagni Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

As stated in the original user terms, we do not allow any marketing language at all. Additionally, we like to retain the history of a product. For those reasons I removed the marketing language and re-added the original history. I kept other changes made but reworded them to meet our wiki's standards. I also re-added information about the lack of a license. The truth is your company does not list the specific license your software is available under (Creative Commons, MIT, etc.) To the benefit of your users, I strongly recommend you update your website to clearly state what specific license the software falls under.

Otherwise, everything else looks OK. Thanks! Shawn Douglas (talk) 14:20, 10 October 2014 (EDT)