Template:Refimprove/doc - Revision history

Shawndouglas: Updated.

2013-05-31T20:04:25Z

Updated.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:04, 31 May 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Documentation subpage}}		{{Documentation subpage}}
	~~{{Twinkle standard installation}}~~
	This template indicates that the article needs additional inline citations. There is currently no consensus on where to place this template. Many editors understand this template to be redundant when it is used on articles clearly marked as ~~[[Wikipedia:Stub\|~~stubs]].		This template indicates that the article needs additional inline citations. There is currently no consensus on where to place this template. Many editors understand this template to be redundant when it is used on articles clearly marked as stubs.

	For articles about living persons, the more specific template {{tl\|BLP sources}} should be used instead.		For articles about living persons, the more specific template {{tl\|BLP sources}} should be used instead.
Line 10:		Line 10:
	A {{para\|talk}} parameter is allowed; setting this to any value will result in the message "See talk page for details." being included in the tag.		A {{para\|talk}} parameter is allowed; setting this to any value will result in the message "See talk page for details." being included in the tag.

	This template also includes support for using the {{para\|date}} parameter. Adding this parameter sorts the article into subcategories of [[:Category:Articles needing additional references]] and out of the parent category, allowing the oldest problems to be identified and dealt with first~~. A [[Wikipedia:Bot policy\|bot]] will add this parameter if it is omitted~~. Be careful '''''not''''' to abbreviate the date, because then it will automatically add a redlinked category instead of the correct category. The simplest way to use this parameter manually is <code><nowiki>{{Refimprove\|{{subst:DATE}}}}</nowiki></code> but it can be done more explicitly as <code><nowiki>{{Refimprove\|date=</nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code> (both result in the same output).		This template also includes support for using the {{para\|date}} parameter. Adding this parameter sorts the article into subcategories of [[:Category:Articles needing additional references]] and out of the parent category, allowing the oldest problems to be identified and dealt with first. Be careful '''''not''''' to abbreviate the date, because then it will automatically add a redlinked category instead of the correct category. The simplest way to use this parameter manually is <code><nowiki>{{Refimprove\|{{subst:DATE}}}}</nowiki></code> but it can be done more explicitly as <code><nowiki>{{Refimprove\|date=</nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code> (both result in the same output).

	Listed below are three options for usage.		Listed below are three options for usage.
Line 38:		Line 38:
	===Differences from {{tl\|Unreferenced}} and {{Tl\|Citation needed}}===		===Differences from {{tl\|Unreferenced}} and {{Tl\|Citation needed}}===
	*Use ''Unreferenced'' when there are no inline citations in an article. If there are one or more, but insufficient inline citations in an article, then use ''refimprove''.		*Use ''Unreferenced'' when there are no inline citations in an article. If there are one or more, but insufficient inline citations in an article, then use ''refimprove''.
	*However if an article has sufficient inline citations, but the article lacks citations to cover specific information (such as ~~[[WP:PROVEIT\|~~no citation on a quotation]]) then use the inline citation template ''{{tl\|citation needed}}'' to indicate more precisely where additional citations are needed. Unlike ''citation needed'', ''refimprove'' places a very conspicuous banner in the article.		*However if an article has sufficient inline citations, but the article lacks citations to cover specific information (such as no citation on a quotation) then use the inline citation template ''{{tl\|citation needed}}'' to indicate more precisely where additional citations are needed. Unlike ''citation needed'', ''refimprove'' places a very conspicuous banner in the article.
	*There is also a {{tlx\|refimprove section}} and the normal variations.		*There is also a {{tlx\|refimprove section}} and the normal variations.

	===Differences from {{Tl\|Primary sources}}===		===Differences from {{Tl\|Primary sources}}===
	*If an article has sufficient inline citations, but if the citations in an article are from primary sources or sources affiliated with the subject ~~(see [[WP:PSTS]])~~, then use ''{{tl\|Primary sources}}''.		*If an article has sufficient inline citations, but if the citations in an article are from primary sources or sources affiliated with the subject, then use ''{{tl\|Primary sources}}''.

	===Differences from {{Tl\|Citation style}}===		===Differences from {{Tl\|Citation style}}===
	*The ''refimprove'' template is intended for use in articles that need additional citations, while ''citation style'' template is used to request consistency within the citations present in an article ~~(see [[WP:CITEVAR]])~~. For example when there is a mixture of ~~[[WP:CITE#Footnotes\|~~footnotes]] or ~~[[WP:CITE#Parenthetical referencing\|~~parenthetical references]].		*The ''refimprove'' template is intended for use in articles that need additional citations, while ''citation style'' template is used to request consistency within the citations present in an article. For example when there is a mixture of footnotes or parenthetical references.

	===Differences from {{Tl\|No footnotes}}, {{Tl\|More footnotes}}===		===Differences from {{Tl\|No footnotes}}, {{Tl\|More footnotes}}===
Line 91:		Line 91:
	*{{Tl\|Reflist}}		*{{Tl\|Reflist}}
	*[[:Template:Citation needed/doc#Inline templates]]		*[[:Template:Citation needed/doc#Inline templates]]
	*[[~~Wikipedia~~:Template messages/Cleanup/Verifiability and sources]]		*[[LIMSWiki:Template messages/Cleanup/Verifiability and sources]]

	<includeonly>		<includeonly>
	<!-- Add Categories below this line -->		<!-- Add Categories below this line -->
	[[Category:Citation and verifiability maintenance templates\|{{PAGENAME}}]]		[[Category:Citation and verifiability maintenance templates\|{{PAGENAME}}]]
	~~[[Category:Exclude in print]]~~
	~~<!-- Add interlangs below this line -->~~
	~~[[ar:قالب:مصادر أكثر]]~~
	~~[[ca:plantilla:Falten referències]]~~
	~~[[cy:Nodyn:GwellaCyfeiriadau]]~~
	~~[[es:Plantilla:Refimprove]]~~
	~~[[fa:الگو:بهبود منبع]]~~
	~~[[ja:Template:出典の明記]]~~
	~~[[mk:Шаблон:Малку извори]]~~
	~~[[ro:Format:Refimprove]]~~
	~~[[ru:Шаблон:Refimprove]]~~
	~~[[sv:Mall:Källor behövs]]~~
	~~[[uk:Шаблон:Refimprove]]~~
	~~[[vi:Bản mẫu:Chú thích trong bài]]~~
	~~[[zh:Template:Refimprove]]~~
	</includeonly>		</includeonly>

LIMSinstitute: 1 revision

2011-08-03T15:33:54Z

1 revision

New page

{{Documentation subpage}}
{{Twinkle standard installation}}
This template indicates that the article needs additional inline citations. There is currently no consensus on where to place this template. Many editors understand this template to be redundant when it is used on articles clearly marked as [[Wikipedia:Stub|stubs]].

For articles about living persons, the more specific template {{tl|BLP sources}} should be used instead.

This template should be used only for articles where there are some, but insufficient, inline citations. For articles that have no inline citations at all currently, use [[:Template:Unreferenced]].

==Usage==
A {{para|talk}} parameter is allowed; setting this to any value will result in the message "See talk page for details." being included in the tag.

This template also includes support for using the {{para|date}} parameter. Adding this parameter sorts the article into subcategories of [[:Category:Articles needing additional references]] and out of the parent category, allowing the oldest problems to be identified and dealt with first. A [[Wikipedia:Bot policy|bot]] will add this parameter if it is omitted. Be careful '''''not''''' to abbreviate the date, because then it will automatically add a redlinked category instead of the correct category. The simplest way to use this parameter manually is <code><nowiki>{{Refimprove|{{subst:DATE}}}}</nowiki></code> but it can be done more explicitly as <code><nowiki>{{Refimprove|date=</nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code> (both result in the same output).

Listed below are three options for usage.

<code>
<nowiki>
{{Refimprove}}
</nowiki>

<nowiki>
{{Refimprove|date=</nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}<nowiki>}}
</nowiki>

<nowiki>
{{Refimprove|article|{{subst:DATE}}|talk=y}}
</nowiki>
</code>

A user warning template, {{tl|Uw-refimprove}}, is available to notify contributors that an article they created needs its referencing improved.

==Differences from related templates==

===General advantage ===
*The naming scheme of Refimprove parallels that used for {{tl|Refbegin}}, {{tl|Refend}}, and {{tl|Reflist}}, thereby reducing confusion, in compliance with the [[KISS principle]].
*Refimprove is easy to use.

===Differences from {{tl|Unreferenced}} and {{Tl|Citation needed}}===
*Use ''Unreferenced'' when there are no inline citations in an article. If there are one or more, but insufficient inline citations in an article, then use ''refimprove''.
*However if an article has sufficient inline citations, but the article lacks citations to cover specific information (such as [[WP:PROVEIT|no citation on a quotation]]) then use the inline citation template ''{{tl|citation needed}}'' to indicate more precisely where additional citations are needed. Unlike ''citation needed'', ''refimprove'' places a very conspicuous banner in the article.
*There is also a {{tlx|refimprove section}} and the normal variations.

===Differences from {{Tl|Primary sources}}===
*If an article has sufficient inline citations, but if the citations in an article are from primary sources or sources affiliated with the subject (see [[WP:PSTS]]), then use ''{{tl|Primary sources}}''.

===Differences from {{Tl|Citation style}}===
*The ''refimprove'' template is intended for use in articles that need additional citations, while ''citation style'' template is used to request consistency within the citations present in an article (see [[WP:CITEVAR]]). For example when there is a mixture of [[WP:CITE#Footnotes|footnotes]] or [[WP:CITE#Parenthetical referencing|parenthetical references]].

===Differences from {{Tl|No footnotes}}, {{Tl|More footnotes}}===
*''Refimprove'' can be used when there is no "References" or "Further reading" section in the article.

==Redirects==

Include:
{{div col|cols=4}}
#{{Tl|Ri}}
#{{Tl|Citations needed}}
#{{Tl|Cite sources}}
#{{Tl|Cleanup-cite}}
#{{Tl|Cleanup-verify}}
#{{Tl|Cleanup cite}}
#{{Tl|Few references}}
#{{Tl|Few refs}}
#{{Tl|Fewreferences}}
#{{Tl|Fewrefs}}
#{{Tl|Improve-references}}
#{{Tl|Improve-refs}}
#{{Tl|Improve references}}
#{{Tl|Improve refs}}
#{{Tl|Improvereferences}}
#{{Tl|Improverefs}}
#{{Tl|More references}}
#{{Tl|More sources}}
#{{Tl|Moreref}}
#{{Tl|Morereferences}}
#{{Tl|Morerefs}}
#{{Tl|Moresources}}
#{{Tl|Not verified}}
#{{Tl|Notverified}}
#{{Tl|Ref-improve}}
#{{Tl|Ref improve}}
#{{Tl|Reference-improve}}
#{{Tl|Sources}}
#{{Tl|Verification}}
#{{Tl|Verify}}
{{div col end}}

==See also==
*{{Tl|Refbegin}}
*{{Tl|Refend}}
*{{Tl|Reflist}}
*[[:Template:Citation needed/doc#Inline templates]]
*[[Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup/Verifiability and sources]]

<includeonly>

[[Category:Citation and verifiability maintenance templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:Exclude in print]]

[[ar:قالب:مصادر أكثر]]
[[ca:plantilla:Falten referències]]
[[cy:Nodyn:GwellaCyfeiriadau]]
[[es:Plantilla:Refimprove]]
[[fa:الگو:بهبود منبع]]
[[ja:Template:出典の明記]]
[[mk:Шаблон:Малку извори]]
[[ro:Format:Refimprove]]
[[ru:Шаблон:Refimprove]]
[[sv:Mall:Källor behövs]]
[[uk:Шаблон:Refimprove]]
[[vi:Bản mẫu:Chú thích trong bài]]
[[zh:Template:Refimprove]]
</includeonly>