Off-the-shelf component - Revision history

Shawndouglas: Updated cat

2014-08-22T16:27:45Z

Updated cat

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:27, 22 August 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	An '''off-the-shelf component''' is usually provided by a commercial [[vendor]] or open source software (OSS).<sup>[1]</sup> Such a component usually has been used in many other systems, and should have fewer defects, or have had more bugs shaken out of it.<sup>[2]</sup>		An '''off-the-shelf component''' is usually provided by a commercial [[vendor]] or open source software (OSS).<sup>[1]</sup> Such a component usually has been used in many other systems, and should have fewer defects, or have had more bugs shaken out of it.<sup>[2]</sup>


	Motivations for using commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components include hopes for reduction of overall system development and costs (as components can be bought or licensed instead of being developed from scratch) and reduced long-term maintenance costs. In software development, many considered COTS to be the silver bullet (to reduce cost/time) during the 1990s, but COTS development came with many not-so-obvious tradeoffs—initial cost and development time can definitely be reduced, but often at the expense of an increase in software component-integration work and a vendor lock-in, i.e., a dependency on third-party component vendors.<sup>[3]</sup>		Motivations for using commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components include hopes for reduction of overall system development and costs (as components can be bought or licensed instead of being developed from scratch) and reduced long-term maintenance costs. In software development, many considered COTS to be the silver bullet (to reduce cost/time) during the 1990s, but COTS development came with many not-so-obvious tradeoffs—initial cost and development time can definitely be reduced, but often at the expense of an increase in software component-integration work and a vendor lock-in, i.e., a dependency on third-party component vendors.<sup>[3]</sup>
Line 11:		Line 10:

	<!---Place all category tags here-->		<!---Place all category tags here-->
	[[Category:Software terms]]		[[Category:Software and hardware terms]]

Shawndouglas: Added cat

2014-08-06T19:18:08Z

Added cat

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:18, 6 August 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:
	# ^ McKinney D (2001. Accessed January 28, 2009.). "Impact of Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Software and Technology on Systems Engineering". http://www.incose.org/northstar/2001Slides/McKinney%20Charts.pdf.		# ^ McKinney D (2001. Accessed January 28, 2009.). "Impact of Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Software and Technology on Systems Engineering". http://www.incose.org/northstar/2001Slides/McKinney%20Charts.pdf.
	# ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-the-shelf_component		# ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-the-shelf_component

			<!---Place all category tags here-->
			[[Category:Software terms]]

Admin: Bolding

2011-04-20T22:19:47Z

Bolding

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 20 April 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	An off-the-shelf component is usually provided by a commercial [[vendor]] or open source software (OSS).<sup>[1]</sup> Such a component usually has been used in many other systems, and should have fewer defects, or have had more bugs shaken out of it.<sup>[2]</sup>		An '''off-the-shelf component''' is usually provided by a commercial [[vendor]] or open source software (OSS).<sup>[1]</sup> Such a component usually has been used in many other systems, and should have fewer defects, or have had more bugs shaken out of it.<sup>[2]</sup>

Admin: Created article stub.

2011-04-20T22:19:28Z

Created article stub.

New page

An off-the-shelf component is usually provided by a commercial [[vendor]] or open source software (OSS).[1] Such a component usually has been used in many other systems, and should have fewer defects, or have had more bugs shaken out of it.[2]

Motivations for using commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components include hopes for reduction of overall system development and costs (as components can be bought or licensed instead of being developed from scratch) and reduced long-term maintenance costs. In software development, many considered COTS to be the silver bullet (to reduce cost/time) during the 1990s, but COTS development came with many not-so-obvious tradeoffs—initial cost and development time can definitely be reduced, but often at the expense of an increase in software component-integration work and a vendor lock-in, i.e., a dependency on third-party component vendors.[3]

== References ==
# ^ Li J, Conradi R, Slyngstad OPN, Bunse C, Khan U, Torchiano M, Morisio M (2005). "An empirical study of off-the shelf component usage in industrial projects". Prod Focused Software Proc Improv. 3547 (2005): 54–68. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.109.5651&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
# ^ Clements PC (Nov 1995). "From subroutines to subsystems: Component-based software development". Amer Programmer 8 (11): 1–8. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.56.729&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
# ^ McKinney D (2001. Accessed January 28, 2009.). "Impact of Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Software and Technology on Systems Engineering". http://www.incose.org/northstar/2001Slides/McKinney%20Charts.pdf.
# ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-the-shelf_component