Agricultural Industry - Revision history

Shawndouglas: Created redirect as necessary due to LIMSwiki naming conventions.

2012-03-08T20:47:23Z

Created redirect as necessary due to LIMSwiki naming conventions.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:47, 8 March 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The '''agriculture industry''' and its associated agricultural laboratories cover a broad scope of activities associated with the raising of food crops. These crops can include fruits, vegetables, land animals, and seafood. In the case of seafood, this generally applies to farmed seafood, whereas seafood captured by fishing boats and the like are addressed separately.		#REDIRECT [[Agriculture industry]]

	Due to the importance of agriculture for any society, appropriate levels of testing for everything from basic soil and irrigation water to final crop testing, are critical. In addition, testing of the impacts of agricultural activities play an important role in policy and the development of appropriate laws and regulations.


	~~== Focus areas for the agricultural laboratory ==~~


	~~===Soil, water, seed and feed===~~

	The raw materials for agriculture begin with water, soil, and seed for plant crops, and supplements for animals (arguably, animals themselves are in a sense raw material, where you are buying breeding stock). Appropriate quality standards need to be met appropriate to the crop being produced. Quality, in this case, governs both basic composition as well as contamination. In the case of composition, much of the testing involved is concerned with both quantitative as well as limit type tests for organic and inorganic compounds.

	Certain laboratories take the information from soil testing and use the data to recommend fertilization approaches based on both the test results and the target crop. In this sense, the opportunity exists for the providing customized fertilization recommendations in response to the test results.

	In addition to composition, contamination is a concern as well. For instance, the presence of pathogens in irrigation water can lead to contaminated food products. In the case of one outbreak of E. coli in Europe, the ultimate culprit appeared to be the provider of sprout seed from Egypt, not the water or any other later stage activity<ref name="Costco">{{cite web \|url=http://www.producenews.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=32602:costco-ups-testing-for-fresh-produce-beef \|author=Murphy, Joan \|title=Costco ups testing for fresh produce, beef \|publisher=The Produce News \|date=21 July 2011 \|accessdate=8 March 2012}}</ref>. The USDA has initiated a Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) program to assist farms with reducing the risk of contamination of food due to such things as irrigation water contamination<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.uvm.edu/vtvegandberry/GAPS/VT%20Water%20Quality%20Criteria.pdf \|title=Water Quality Criteria For Agricultural Water Sources and Microbial Testing Guidelines \|publisher=Vermont Agency of Agriculture \|date=June 2009 \|accessdate=8 March 2012 \|format=PDF}}</ref>.

	In the case of either soil or feed, and to a much lesser extent water (unless one is discussing sludge as fertilizer), complexity of the matrix, and the potential for invalid results is significant<ref>{{cite book \|author=Hanlon, E.A.; H.J. Savoy \|title=Procedures used by state soil testing laboratories in the Southern region of the United States \|year=2009 \|publisher=Southern Extension and Research Activity Information Exchange Group 6 \|pages=14 \|url=http://www.clemson.edu/sera6/srbull409aug09versionupdatedISBNbull.pdf \|format=PDF}}</ref>. In some early LIMS designed specifically for application in soil testing laboratories, elaborate cross checks between various test results were utilized to look for inconsistencies. Clearly, this will drive a different approach to the design of the LIMS than when much simpler final results are required with little interaction between completely different tests.

	~~'''International Seed Testing Association'''~~

	~~The~~ [http://www.seedtest.org/ International Seed Testing Association] (ISTA) is a voluntary association whose primary objective is the establishment of uniformity of seed testing throughout the world. The association, initially founded with the intent of publishing seed testing methods has expanded it’s functions beyond that singular intention. Much of the ancillary work is still related to that process - the hosting of international conferences, support of research programs expanding the science of seed testing, and related activities.

	~~'''ISTA Accreditation Programme'''~~

	Beyond the establishment of standardized methods, which it continues to do, ISTA also has an established program by which seed testing laboratories can seek accreditation from ISTA for conformance with ISTA standards. The accreditation process is lengthy, involving membership application, proficiency testing, submission and review of an application, and an audit. Below is a flowchart representing the accreditation process with ISTA.

	[~~[File:Flowchartaccreditation.gif~~]]

	~~'''Types of seed tests and seed testing challenges'''~~

	The ISTA International Rules for Seed Testing contains 18 chapters covering testing methodologies, sampling procedures, and processes for more complex testing issues<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.seedtest.org/en/international-rules-for-seed-testing-_content---1--1083--238.html \|title=International Rules for Seed Testing - Edition 2012 \|publisher=International Seed Testing Association \|accessdate=8 March 2012}}</ref>. The chapters address such subjects as purity, germination (both actual germination and the predictive tetrazolium test), seed health, seed vigor, moisture content, and testing of coated seeds and seed mixtures. In addition, the complexities of sampling are covered in their own chapter.

	~~===Food testing===~~

	Testing of food products, whether it be meat or produce, is largely concerned with microbial contamination. Because of sampling questions, the superior testing approach may be to test the run off and irrigation water for a field. Efforts are under way to to identify very low levels of bacterial contamination in this water.

	Although government regulatory agencies, such as the USDA Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) require testing of especially meat and poultry for microbial contamination, increasingly vendors are enacting such requirements on their own<ref name="Costco"/>. As well, these requirements, whether regulatory or business, are also requiring holding the product in question, until the test results have been returned. This switch to test and hold, would have an impact on turn around time requirements for the laboratory - placing efficiency at a higher level in the requirements list, than it might have been in the past. It should be noted that many of these testing requirements apply to food processing facilities (meat packers and slaughtering operations), but owing to the introduction of bacterial contaminants earlier in the food production chain, such testing requirements are now applying to farming activities.

	~~===Environmental testing===~~

	~~'''Run off and sludge testing'''~~

	[[File:Buncefield, Emergency fire water pond (2) - geograph.org.uk - 1248740.jpg\|thumb\|240px\|Fire water can be a significant source of agricultural pollution.]]Agriculture is associated with 48% of the impaired river miles in the United States<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/nps/agriculture/agmm_index.cfm \|title=National Management Measures to Control Nonpoint Source Pollution from Agriculture \|publisher=U.S. EPA \|date=July 2003 \|accessdate=8 March 2012}}</ref>, which drives a significant focus on wastewater testing in support of the Agricultural industry. Similar to many other forms of agricultural samples, preparation of wastewater samples is a key to successful completion of the tests. A typical agriculture lab will need to track many aspects of the preparation of a sample for completion of the actual target test {{citation needed}}. Further, owing to the fact that this is EPA related testing, chain of custody takes on a level of importance that may not be as critical in other industries<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.epa.gov/apti/coc/ \|title=Chain-of-Custody Procedures for Samples and Data \|publisher=U.S. EPA \|accessdate=8 March 2012}}</ref>. The risk of fraud, of course, is what drives this need.

	Firewater, that is, water used to fight fires on a farm, can prove to be a significant source of pollution, as the various herbicides, fertilizers, and other chemicals that are the fuel source for the fire, then become a component of the runoff firewater.<ref>{{cite book \|url=http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/PDF/PMHO600BBUD-E-E.pdf \|title=Managing Fire Water and Major Spillages: PPG 18 \|author=McGlashan, Bruce \|year=2001 \|pages=1 \|publisher=Environment Agency \|format=PDF}}</ref>

	~~===Veterinary testing===~~

	~~'''Animal health related'''~~

	Animal health testing, similar to human testing, involves analysis of a variety of body fluids and tissues. Typical tests involve multi-step sample preparation. In some cases, these tests include inoculation into other animals in order to isolate the virus, followed by laboratory analysis via a number of techniques, such as ELISA or PCR. Support of these tests require tracking of manual sample preparation steps as well as instrument integration in order to maximize efficiency.

	The nature of many of the tests in the clinical, and especially clinical pathology lab often warrants significant customization of the laboratory information system, as the particular data and graphics may need to be presented in very unique ways for each individual test.

	The veterinary clinical laboratory has to also contend with the fact that it is dealing with multiple different species, thus complicating further tests that are already complicated in their own right.

	~~'''Necropsy'''~~

	~~Frequently, the veterinary clinical laboratory is working to diagnose disease within a dead animal, in the interest of dealing with either treating or preventing disease in the rest of the herd.~~

	~~===Organic food===~~

	Food that has been produced organically is becoming increasingly popular in the United States<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.michigandaily.com/content/popularity-organic-foods-grow \|title=Popularity of organic foods grow \|author=Edwards, Victoria \|publisher=The Michigan Daily \|date=1 April 2003 \|accessdate=8 March 2012}}</ref>. The underlying principle is to have food that is more natural, and therefore healthier to eat. In addition, is the interest in employing more sustainable farming techniques<ref name="Organic Info">{{cite web \|url=http://www.nal.usda.gov/afsic/pubs/ofp/ofp.shtml \|title=Organic Production and Organic Food: Information Access Tools \|publisher=USDA National Agricultural Library \|date=June 2007 \|accessdate=8 March 2012}}</ref>. However, defining organic has been notoriously challenging. In 1995, the USDA developed a series of working definitions around organic<ref name="Organic Info" />. The underlying principles are minimization of off-farm inputs, and the attempt at working in an ecologically balanced, sustainable manner. At the same time, the USDA is aware that elimination of all synthetic (i.e. non-natural) residues may be unavoidable, and thus the focus is on limits, rather than the complete absence of certain compounds, as well as on the overall system used to produce, process, and transport the organic product<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://oianorth.com/blog/entry/1925033/managing-environmental-contamination \|title=Managing Environmental Contamination under the USDA National Organic Program \|publisher=OIA North America \|date=20 June 2011 \|accessdate=8 March 2012}}</ref>.

	The production of organic food provides no unique analytical challenges with regard to ongoing operations. However, analysis can provide a key component of the certification process, as the USDA Inspector General’s office has called for certifying agencies to provide actual analytical evidence that food claiming to be pesticide free actually are. This is part of an overall requirement for the USDA to more closely oversee their organic certifying agencies.

	~~===Quality testing of pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers, and related items===~~

	~~Quality testing of many of these agents involves not only routine product testing, but also testing involved in the registration of the products.~~

	Regulation of fertilizer quality is significant, particularly in developing nations, although state agricultural agencies within the US also maintain labeling requirements intent on assuring that fertilizers conform to the manufacturer’s stated specifications. Clearly, fertilizer that does not contain the amount of ingredients that the customer is expecting, will not produce the intended results. With increasing focus on fertilizer calibration, the importance of quality control of fertilizer batches will presumably rise, as prescriptive fertilizer recommendation is of little use if fertilizer composition is wildly variant.

	~~===Metrology===~~

	~~'''Weights and measures'''~~

	Although the National Institute of Standards and Technologies (formerly the National Bureau of Standards) has its roots in the Treasury Department, in most states, the Department of Weights and Measures is a division of the Department of Agriculture. Historically, this may have come about as some of the earliest legal standards with regard to weights and measures we see in Europe have to do with standardized measures of corn in the Magna Carta. A standard definition ensures fairness in trade, and for most of human history trade has largely been focused on agricultural products.

	As the need for additional measurement services developed outside the immediate realm of agriculture, these capabilities grew within the Department of Agriculture. Among these services are providing calibration services for laboratories as well as certification for private metrology service companies, a key component of any laboratory organization.

	~~'''Fuel testing'''~~

	~~In addition to testing delivery of fuel, many state departments of agriculture are responsible for fuel standards adherence - that is, to octane ratings and similar quality measures.~~

	~~===Unique challenges for the agricultural laboratory===~~

	~~===Government laboratories vs. private laboratories===~~

	~~===Government regulatory agencies governing the agriculture sector===~~

	~~'''USDA'''~~
	~~Good Agricultural Practices Program~~

	~~'''FDA'''~~
	~~'''EPA'''~~

	~~==References==~~
	~~{{reflist}}~~

Shawndouglas: Updated all titles and headers per LIMSwiki guidelines. Will also have to move article due to incorrect use of naming conventions.

2012-03-08T20:40:24Z

Updated all titles and headers per LIMSwiki guidelines. Will also have to move article due to incorrect use of naming conventions.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:40, 8 March 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:


	== Focus ~~Areas~~ for the ~~Agricultural Laboratory~~ ==		== Focus areas for the agricultural laboratory ==


	===Soil, ~~Water~~, ~~Seed~~ and ~~Feed~~===		===Soil, water, seed and feed===

	The raw materials for agriculture begin with water, soil, and seed for plant crops, and supplements for animals (arguably, animals themselves are in a sense raw material, where you are buying breeding stock). Appropriate quality standards need to be met appropriate to the crop being produced. Quality, in this case, governs both basic composition as well as contamination. In the case of composition, much of the testing involved is concerned with both quantitative as well as limit type tests for organic and inorganic compounds.		The raw materials for agriculture begin with water, soil, and seed for plant crops, and supplements for animals (arguably, animals themselves are in a sense raw material, where you are buying breeding stock). Appropriate quality standards need to be met appropriate to the crop being produced. Quality, in this case, governs both basic composition as well as contamination. In the case of composition, much of the testing involved is concerned with both quantitative as well as limit type tests for organic and inorganic compounds.
Line 27:		Line 27:
	[[File:Flowchartaccreditation.gif]]		[[File:Flowchartaccreditation.gif]]

	'''Types of ~~Seed Tests~~ and ~~Seed Testing Challenges~~'''		'''Types of seed tests and seed testing challenges'''

	The ISTA International Rules for Seed Testing contains 18 chapters covering testing methodologies, sampling procedures, and processes for more complex testing issues<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.seedtest.org/en/international-rules-for-seed-testing-_content---1--1083--238.html \|title=International Rules for Seed Testing - Edition 2012 \|publisher=International Seed Testing Association \|accessdate=8 March 2012}}</ref>. The chapters address such subjects as purity, germination (both actual germination and the predictive tetrazolium test), seed health, seed vigor, moisture content, and testing of coated seeds and seed mixtures. In addition, the complexities of sampling are covered in their own chapter.		The ISTA International Rules for Seed Testing contains 18 chapters covering testing methodologies, sampling procedures, and processes for more complex testing issues<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.seedtest.org/en/international-rules-for-seed-testing-_content---1--1083--238.html \|title=International Rules for Seed Testing - Edition 2012 \|publisher=International Seed Testing Association \|accessdate=8 March 2012}}</ref>. The chapters address such subjects as purity, germination (both actual germination and the predictive tetrazolium test), seed health, seed vigor, moisture content, and testing of coated seeds and seed mixtures. In addition, the complexities of sampling are covered in their own chapter.

	===Food ~~Testing~~===		===Food testing===

	Testing of food products, whether it be meat or produce, is largely concerned with microbial contamination. Because of sampling questions, the superior testing approach may be to test the run off and irrigation water for a field. Efforts are under way to to identify very low levels of bacterial contamination in this water.		Testing of food products, whether it be meat or produce, is largely concerned with microbial contamination. Because of sampling questions, the superior testing approach may be to test the run off and irrigation water for a field. Efforts are under way to to identify very low levels of bacterial contamination in this water.
Line 37:		Line 37:
	Although government regulatory agencies, such as the USDA Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) require testing of especially meat and poultry for microbial contamination, increasingly vendors are enacting such requirements on their own<ref name="Costco"/>. As well, these requirements, whether regulatory or business, are also requiring holding the product in question, until the test results have been returned. This switch to test and hold, would have an impact on turn around time requirements for the laboratory - placing efficiency at a higher level in the requirements list, than it might have been in the past. It should be noted that many of these testing requirements apply to food processing facilities (meat packers and slaughtering operations), but owing to the introduction of bacterial contaminants earlier in the food production chain, such testing requirements are now applying to farming activities.		Although government regulatory agencies, such as the USDA Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) require testing of especially meat and poultry for microbial contamination, increasingly vendors are enacting such requirements on their own<ref name="Costco"/>. As well, these requirements, whether regulatory or business, are also requiring holding the product in question, until the test results have been returned. This switch to test and hold, would have an impact on turn around time requirements for the laboratory - placing efficiency at a higher level in the requirements list, than it might have been in the past. It should be noted that many of these testing requirements apply to food processing facilities (meat packers and slaughtering operations), but owing to the introduction of bacterial contaminants earlier in the food production chain, such testing requirements are now applying to farming activities.

	===Environmental ~~Testing~~===		===Environmental testing===

	'''Run off and sludge testing'''		'''Run off and sludge testing'''
Line 45:		Line 45:
	Firewater, that is, water used to fight fires on a farm, can prove to be a significant source of pollution, as the various herbicides, fertilizers, and other chemicals that are the fuel source for the fire, then become a component of the runoff firewater.<ref>{{cite book \|url=http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/PDF/PMHO600BBUD-E-E.pdf \|title=Managing Fire Water and Major Spillages: PPG 18 \|author=McGlashan, Bruce \|year=2001 \|pages=1 \|publisher=Environment Agency \|format=PDF}}</ref>		Firewater, that is, water used to fight fires on a farm, can prove to be a significant source of pollution, as the various herbicides, fertilizers, and other chemicals that are the fuel source for the fire, then become a component of the runoff firewater.<ref>{{cite book \|url=http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/PDF/PMHO600BBUD-E-E.pdf \|title=Managing Fire Water and Major Spillages: PPG 18 \|author=McGlashan, Bruce \|year=2001 \|pages=1 \|publisher=Environment Agency \|format=PDF}}</ref>

	===Veterinary ~~Testing~~===		===Veterinary testing===

	'''Animal ~~Health Related~~'''		'''Animal health related'''

	Animal health testing, similar to human testing, involves analysis of a variety of body fluids and tissues. Typical tests involve multi-step sample preparation. In some cases, these tests include inoculation into other animals in order to isolate the virus, followed by laboratory analysis via a number of techniques, such as ELISA or PCR. Support of these tests require tracking of manual sample preparation steps as well as instrument integration in order to maximize efficiency.		Animal health testing, similar to human testing, involves analysis of a variety of body fluids and tissues. Typical tests involve multi-step sample preparation. In some cases, these tests include inoculation into other animals in order to isolate the virus, followed by laboratory analysis via a number of techniques, such as ELISA or PCR. Support of these tests require tracking of manual sample preparation steps as well as instrument integration in order to maximize efficiency.
Line 59:		Line 59:
	Frequently, the veterinary clinical laboratory is working to diagnose disease within a dead animal, in the interest of dealing with either treating or preventing disease in the rest of the herd.		Frequently, the veterinary clinical laboratory is working to diagnose disease within a dead animal, in the interest of dealing with either treating or preventing disease in the rest of the herd.

	===Organic ~~Food~~===		===Organic food===

	Food that has been produced organically is becoming increasingly popular in the United States<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.michigandaily.com/content/popularity-organic-foods-grow \|title=Popularity of organic foods grow \|author=Edwards, Victoria \|publisher=The Michigan Daily \|date=1 April 2003 \|accessdate=8 March 2012}}</ref>. The underlying principle is to have food that is more natural, and therefore healthier to eat. In addition, is the interest in employing more sustainable farming techniques<ref name="Organic Info">{{cite web \|url=http://www.nal.usda.gov/afsic/pubs/ofp/ofp.shtml \|title=Organic Production and Organic Food: Information Access Tools \|publisher=USDA National Agricultural Library \|date=June 2007 \|accessdate=8 March 2012}}</ref>. However, defining organic has been notoriously challenging. In 1995, the USDA developed a series of working definitions around organic<ref name="Organic Info" />. The underlying principles are minimization of off-farm inputs, and the attempt at working in an ecologically balanced, sustainable manner. At the same time, the USDA is aware that elimination of all synthetic (i.e. non-natural) residues may be unavoidable, and thus the focus is on limits, rather than the complete absence of certain compounds, as well as on the overall system used to produce, process, and transport the organic product<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://oianorth.com/blog/entry/1925033/managing-environmental-contamination \|title=Managing Environmental Contamination under the USDA National Organic Program \|publisher=OIA North America \|date=20 June 2011 \|accessdate=8 March 2012}}</ref>.		Food that has been produced organically is becoming increasingly popular in the United States<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.michigandaily.com/content/popularity-organic-foods-grow \|title=Popularity of organic foods grow \|author=Edwards, Victoria \|publisher=The Michigan Daily \|date=1 April 2003 \|accessdate=8 March 2012}}</ref>. The underlying principle is to have food that is more natural, and therefore healthier to eat. In addition, is the interest in employing more sustainable farming techniques<ref name="Organic Info">{{cite web \|url=http://www.nal.usda.gov/afsic/pubs/ofp/ofp.shtml \|title=Organic Production and Organic Food: Information Access Tools \|publisher=USDA National Agricultural Library \|date=June 2007 \|accessdate=8 March 2012}}</ref>. However, defining organic has been notoriously challenging. In 1995, the USDA developed a series of working definitions around organic<ref name="Organic Info" />. The underlying principles are minimization of off-farm inputs, and the attempt at working in an ecologically balanced, sustainable manner. At the same time, the USDA is aware that elimination of all synthetic (i.e. non-natural) residues may be unavoidable, and thus the focus is on limits, rather than the complete absence of certain compounds, as well as on the overall system used to produce, process, and transport the organic product<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://oianorth.com/blog/entry/1925033/managing-environmental-contamination \|title=Managing Environmental Contamination under the USDA National Organic Program \|publisher=OIA North America \|date=20 June 2011 \|accessdate=8 March 2012}}</ref>.
Line 65:		Line 65:
	The production of organic food provides no unique analytical challenges with regard to ongoing operations. However, analysis can provide a key component of the certification process, as the USDA Inspector General’s office has called for certifying agencies to provide actual analytical evidence that food claiming to be pesticide free actually are. This is part of an overall requirement for the USDA to more closely oversee their organic certifying agencies.		The production of organic food provides no unique analytical challenges with regard to ongoing operations. However, analysis can provide a key component of the certification process, as the USDA Inspector General’s office has called for certifying agencies to provide actual analytical evidence that food claiming to be pesticide free actually are. This is part of an overall requirement for the USDA to more closely oversee their organic certifying agencies.

	===Quality ~~Testing~~ of ~~Pesticides~~, ~~Herbicides~~, ~~Fertilizers~~, and ~~Related Items~~===		===Quality testing of pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers, and related items===

	Quality testing of many of these agents involves not only routine product testing, but also testing involved in the registration of the products.		Quality testing of many of these agents involves not only routine product testing, but also testing involved in the registration of the products.
Line 73:		Line 73:
	===Metrology===		===Metrology===

	'''Weights and ~~Measures~~'''		'''Weights and measures'''

	Although the National Institute of Standards and Technologies (formerly the National Bureau of Standards) has its roots in the Treasury Department, in most states, the Department of Weights and Measures is a division of the Department of Agriculture. Historically, this may have come about as some of the earliest legal standards with regard to weights and measures we see in Europe have to do with standardized measures of corn in the Magna Carta. A standard definition ensures fairness in trade, and for most of human history trade has largely been focused on agricultural products.		Although the National Institute of Standards and Technologies (formerly the National Bureau of Standards) has its roots in the Treasury Department, in most states, the Department of Weights and Measures is a division of the Department of Agriculture. Historically, this may have come about as some of the earliest legal standards with regard to weights and measures we see in Europe have to do with standardized measures of corn in the Magna Carta. A standard definition ensures fairness in trade, and for most of human history trade has largely been focused on agricultural products.
Line 79:		Line 79:
	As the need for additional measurement services developed outside the immediate realm of agriculture, these capabilities grew within the Department of Agriculture. Among these services are providing calibration services for laboratories as well as certification for private metrology service companies, a key component of any laboratory organization.		As the need for additional measurement services developed outside the immediate realm of agriculture, these capabilities grew within the Department of Agriculture. Among these services are providing calibration services for laboratories as well as certification for private metrology service companies, a key component of any laboratory organization.

	'''Fuel ~~Testing~~'''		'''Fuel testing'''

	In addition to testing delivery of fuel, many state departments of agriculture are responsible for fuel standards adherence - that is, to octane ratings and similar quality measures.		In addition to testing delivery of fuel, many state departments of agriculture are responsible for fuel standards adherence - that is, to octane ratings and similar quality measures.

	===Unique ~~Challenges~~ for the ~~Agricultural Laboratory~~===		===Unique challenges for the agricultural laboratory===

	===Government ~~Laboratories~~ vs. ~~Private Laboratories~~===		===Government laboratories vs. private laboratories===

	===Government ~~Regulatory Agencies Governing~~ the ~~Agriculture Sector~~===		===Government regulatory agencies governing the agriculture sector===

	'''USDA'''		'''USDA'''

Shawndouglas: Updated all references to optimal format. Corrected a few bits of grammar. Added an image. Moved intro to top.

2012-03-08T20:36:56Z

Updated all references to optimal format. Corrected a few bits of grammar. Added an image. Moved intro to top.

Show changes

Jleecbd: /* Organic Food */

2012-03-04T04:47:32Z

Organic Food

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:47, 4 March 2012
Line 66:		Line 66:
	===Organic Food===		===Organic Food===

	Food that has been produced organically is becoming increasingly popular in the United States. The underlying principle is to have food that is more natural, and therefore healthier to eat. However, defining organic has been notoriously challenging. In 1995, the USDA developed a series of working definitions around Organic. The underlying principles are minimization of off-farm inputs, and the attempt at working in an ecologically balanced, sustainable manner. At the same time, the USDA is aware that elimination of all synthetic (i.e. non-natural) residues may be unavoidable, and thus the focus is on limits, rather than the complete absence of certain compounds, as well as on the overall system used to produce, process, and transport the organic product.		Food that has been produced organically is becoming increasingly popular in the United States<ref>[http://www.michigandaily.com/content/popularity-organic-foods-grow Edwards, V. Popularity of organic foods grow.]</ref>. The underlying principle is to have food that is more natural, and therefore healthier to eat. In addition, is the interest in employing more sustainable farming techniques<ref name="Organic Info">[http://www.nal.usda.gov/afsic/pubs/ofp/ofp.shtml Organic Production and Organic Food: Information Access Tools]</ref>. However, defining organic has been notoriously challenging. In 1995, the USDA developed a series of working definitions around Organic<ref name="Organic Info"/>. The underlying principles are minimization of off-farm inputs, and the attempt at working in an ecologically balanced, sustainable manner. At the same time, the USDA is aware that elimination of all synthetic (i.e. non-natural) residues may be unavoidable, and thus the focus is on limits, rather than the complete absence of certain compounds, as well as on the overall system used to produce, process, and transport the organic product<ref>[http://oianorth.com/blog/entry/1925033/managing-environmental-contamination- Managing Environmental Contamination - OIA North America]</ref>.

	The production of organic food provides no unique analytical challenges with regard to ongoing operations. However, analysis can provide a key component of the certification process, as the USDA Inspector General’s office has called for certifying agencies to provide actual analytical evidence that food claiming to be pesticide free actually are. This is part of an overall requirement for the USDA to more closely oversee their organic certifying agencies.		The production of organic food provides no unique analytical challenges with regard to ongoing operations. However, analysis can provide a key component of the certification process, as the USDA Inspector General’s office has called for certifying agencies to provide actual analytical evidence that food claiming to be pesticide free actually are. This is part of an overall requirement for the USDA to more closely oversee their organic certifying agencies.

Jleecbd: /* Environmental Testing */

2012-03-04T03:05:31Z

Environmental Testing

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:05, 4 March 2012
Line 46:		Line 46:
	'''Run off and sludge testing'''		'''Run off and sludge testing'''

	Agriculture is associated with 48% of the impaired river miles in the United States, which drives a significant focus on wastewater testing in support of the Agricultural industry. Similar to many other forms of agricultural samples, preparation of wastewater samples is a key to successful completion of the tests. A typical Agriculture lab will need to track many aspects of the preparation of a sample for completion of the actual target test ~~(assumption - need to verify this)~~. Further, owing to the fact that this is EPA related testing, chain of custody takes on a level of importance that may not be as critical in other industries. The risk of fraud, of course, is what drives this need.		Agriculture is associated with 48% of the impaired river miles in the United States<ref>[http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/nps/agriculture/agmm_index.cfm National management measures to control nonpoint source pollution from agriculture.]</ref>, which drives a significant focus on wastewater testing in support of the Agricultural industry. Similar to many other forms of agricultural samples, preparation of wastewater samples is a key to successful completion of the tests. A typical Agriculture lab will need to track many aspects of the preparation of a sample for completion of the actual target test {{citation needed}}. Further, owing to the fact that this is EPA related testing, chain of custody takes on a level of importance that may not be as critical in other industries<ref>[http://www.epa.gov/apti/coc/ Chain-of-custody procedures for samples and data.]</ref>. The risk of fraud, of course, is what drives this need.

	Firewater, that is, water used to fight fires on a farm, can prove to be a significant source of pollution, as the various herbicides, fertilizers, and other chemicals that are the fuel source for the fire, then become a component of the runoff firewater.		Firewater, that is, water used to fight fires on a farm, can prove to be a significant source of pollution, as the various herbicides, fertilizers, and other chemicals that are the fuel source for the fire, then become a component of the runoff firewater.<ref>[http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/PDF/PMHO600BBUD-E-E.pdf Managing fire water and major spillages.]</ref>

	===Veterinary Testing===		===Veterinary Testing===

Jleecbd: /* Food Testing */

2012-03-04T02:26:55Z

Food Testing

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:26, 4 March 2012
Line 40:		Line 40:
	Testing of food products, whether it be meat or produce, is largely concerned with microbial contamination. Because of sampling questions, the superior testing approach may be to test the run off and irrigation water for a field. Efforts are under way to to identify very low levels of bacterial contamination in this water.		Testing of food products, whether it be meat or produce, is largely concerned with microbial contamination. Because of sampling questions, the superior testing approach may be to test the run off and irrigation water for a field. Efforts are under way to to identify very low levels of bacterial contamination in this water.

	Although government regulatory agencies, such as the USDA Food Safety Inspection Service(FSIS) require testing of especially meat and poultry for microbial contamination, increasingly vendors are enacting such requirements on their. As well, these requirements, whether regulatory or business, are also requiring holding the product in question, until the test results have been returned. This switch to test and hold, would have an impact on turn around time requirements for the laboratory - placing efficiency at a higher level in the requirements list, than it might have been in the past. It should be noted that many of these testing requirements apply to food processing facilities (meat packers and slaughtering operations), but owing to the introduction of bacterial contaminants earlier in the food production chain, such testing requirements are now applying to farming activities.		Although government regulatory agencies, such as the USDA Food Safety Inspection Service(FSIS) require testing of especially meat and poultry for microbial contamination, increasingly vendors are enacting such requirements on their own<ref name="Costco"/>. As well, these requirements, whether regulatory or business, are also requiring holding the product in question, until the test results have been returned. This switch to test and hold, would have an impact on turn around time requirements for the laboratory - placing efficiency at a higher level in the requirements list, than it might have been in the past. It should be noted that many of these testing requirements apply to food processing facilities (meat packers and slaughtering operations), but owing to the introduction of bacterial contaminants earlier in the food production chain, such testing requirements are now applying to farming activities.

	===Environmental Testing===		===Environmental Testing===

Jleecbd: /* Soil, Water, Seed and Feed */

2012-03-04T02:25:38Z

Soil, Water, Seed and Feed

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:25, 4 March 2012
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Certain laboratories take the information from soil testing and use the data to recommend fertilization approaches based on both the test results and the target crop. In this sense, the opportunity exists for the providing customized fertilization recommendations in response to the test results.		Certain laboratories take the information from soil testing and use the data to recommend fertilization approaches based on both the test results and the target crop. In this sense, the opportunity exists for the providing customized fertilization recommendations in response to the test results.

	In addition to composition, contamination is a concern as well. For instance, the presence of pathogens in irrigation water can lead to contaminated food products. In the case of one outbreak of E. coli in Europe, the ultimate culprit appeared to be the provider of sprout seed from Egypt, not the water or any other later stage activity<ref>[http://www.producenews.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=32602:costco-ups-testing-for-fresh-produce-beef&catid=43:featured&Itemid=41 Murphy, J. Costco ups testing for fresh produce, beef.]</ref>. The USDA has initiated a Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) program to assist farms with reducing the risk of contamination of food due to such things as irrigation water contamination<ref>(2009). Water quality criteria for agricultural water sources and microbial testing guidelines. Technical report, Vermont Agency of Agriculture</ref>.		In addition to composition, contamination is a concern as well. For instance, the presence of pathogens in irrigation water can lead to contaminated food products. In the case of one outbreak of E. coli in Europe, the ultimate culprit appeared to be the provider of sprout seed from Egypt, not the water or any other later stage activity<ref name="Costco">[http://www.producenews.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=32602:costco-ups-testing-for-fresh-produce-beef&catid=43:featured&Itemid=41 Murphy, J. Costco ups testing for fresh produce, beef.]</ref>. The USDA has initiated a Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) program to assist farms with reducing the risk of contamination of food due to such things as irrigation water contamination<ref>(2009). Water quality criteria for agricultural water sources and microbial testing guidelines. Technical report, Vermont Agency of Agriculture</ref>.

	In the case of either soil or feed, and to a much lesser extent water (unless one is discussing sludge as fertilizer), complexity of the matrix, and the potential for invalid results is significant<ref>Station, C. E. (2009). Procedures used by state soil testing laboratories in the southern region of the united states. Technical report, Southern Extension and Research Activity Information Exchange Group 6.</ref>. In some early LIMS designed specifically for application in soil testing laboratories, elaborate cross checks between various test results were utilized to look for inconsistencies. Clearly, this will drive a different approach to the design of the LIMS than when much simpler final results are required with little interaction between completely different tests.		In the case of either soil or feed, and to a much lesser extent water (unless one is discussing sludge as fertilizer), complexity of the matrix, and the potential for invalid results is significant<ref>Station, C. E. (2009). Procedures used by state soil testing laboratories in the southern region of the united states. Technical report, Southern Extension and Research Activity Information Exchange Group 6.</ref>. In some early LIMS designed specifically for application in soil testing laboratories, elaborate cross checks between various test results were utilized to look for inconsistencies. Clearly, this will drive a different approach to the design of the LIMS than when much simpler final results are required with little interaction between completely different tests.

Jleecbd: /* Soil, Water, Seed and Feed */

2012-03-04T02:06:16Z

Soil, Water, Seed and Feed

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 4 March 2012
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Certain laboratories take the information from soil testing and use the data to recommend fertilization approaches based on both the test results and the target crop. In this sense, the opportunity exists for the providing customized fertilization recommendations in response to the test results.		Certain laboratories take the information from soil testing and use the data to recommend fertilization approaches based on both the test results and the target crop. In this sense, the opportunity exists for the providing customized fertilization recommendations in response to the test results.

	In addition to composition, contamination is a concern as well. For instance, the presence of pathogens in irrigation water can lead to contaminated food products. In the case of one outbreak of E. coli in Europe, the ultimate culprit appeared to be the provider of sprout seed from Egypt, not the water or any other later stage activity<ref>[http://www.producenews.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=32602:costco-ups-testing-for-fresh-produce-beef&catid=43:featured&Itemid=41 Murphy, J. Costco ups testing for fresh produce, beef.]</ref>. The USDA has initiated a Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) program to assist farms with reducing the risk of contamination of food due to such things as irrigation water contamination.		In addition to composition, contamination is a concern as well. For instance, the presence of pathogens in irrigation water can lead to contaminated food products. In the case of one outbreak of E. coli in Europe, the ultimate culprit appeared to be the provider of sprout seed from Egypt, not the water or any other later stage activity<ref>[http://www.producenews.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=32602:costco-ups-testing-for-fresh-produce-beef&catid=43:featured&Itemid=41 Murphy, J. Costco ups testing for fresh produce, beef.]</ref>. The USDA has initiated a Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) program to assist farms with reducing the risk of contamination of food due to such things as irrigation water contamination<ref>(2009). Water quality criteria for agricultural water sources and microbial testing guidelines. Technical report, Vermont Agency of Agriculture</ref>.

	In the case of either soil or feed, and to a much lesser extent water (unless one is discussing sludge as fertilizer), complexity of the matrix, and the potential for invalid results is significant. In some early LIMS designed specifically for application in soil testing laboratories, elaborate cross checks between various test results were utilized to look for inconsistencies. Clearly, this will drive a different approach to the design of the LIMS than when much simpler final results are required with little interaction between completely different tests.		In the case of either soil or feed, and to a much lesser extent water (unless one is discussing sludge as fertilizer), complexity of the matrix, and the potential for invalid results is significant<ref>Station, C. E. (2009). Procedures used by state soil testing laboratories in the southern region of the united states. Technical report, Southern Extension and Research Activity Information Exchange Group 6.</ref>. In some early LIMS designed specifically for application in soil testing laboratories, elaborate cross checks between various test results were utilized to look for inconsistencies. Clearly, this will drive a different approach to the design of the LIMS than when much simpler final results are required with little interaction between completely different tests.

	'''ISTA'''		'''ISTA'''

	The International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) is a voluntary association who’s primary objective is the establishment of uniformity of seed testing throughout the world. The association, initially founded with the intent of publishing seed testing methods has expanded it’s functions beyond that singular intention. Much of the ancillary work is still related to that process - the hosting of international conferences, support of research programs expanding the science of seed testing, and related activities.		The [http://www.seedtest.org/ International Seed Testing Association] (ISTA) is a voluntary association who’s primary objective is the establishment of uniformity of seed testing throughout the world. The association, initially founded with the intent of publishing seed testing methods has expanded it’s functions beyond that singular intention. Much of the ancillary work is still related to that process - the hosting of international conferences, support of research programs expanding the science of seed testing, and related activities.

	'''ISTA Accreditation Programme'''		'''ISTA Accreditation Programme'''
Line 34:		Line 34:
	'''Types of Seed Tests and Seed Testing Challenges'''		'''Types of Seed Tests and Seed Testing Challenges'''

	The ISTA International Rules for Seed Testing contains 18 chapters covering testing methodologies, sampling procedures, and processes for more complex testing issues. The chapters address such subjects as purity, germination (both actual germination and the predictive tetrazolium test), seed health, seed vigor, moisture content, and testing of coated seeds and seed mixtures. In addition, the complexities of sampling are covered in their own chapter.		The ISTA International Rules for Seed Testing contains 18 chapters covering testing methodologies, sampling procedures, and processes for more complex testing issues<ref>(2011). Changes to the international rules for seed testing 2012 edition, Seed Testing International.</ref>. The chapters address such subjects as purity, germination (both actual germination and the predictive tetrazolium test), seed health, seed vigor, moisture content, and testing of coated seeds and seed mixtures. In addition, the complexities of sampling are covered in their own chapter.

	===Food Testing===		===Food Testing===

Jleecbd: /* Soil, Water, Seed and Feed */

2012-03-04T01:01:32Z

Soil, Water, Seed and Feed

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:01, 4 March 2012
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Certain laboratories take the information from soil testing and use the data to recommend fertilization approaches based on both the test results and the target crop. In this sense, the opportunity exists for the providing customized fertilization recommendations in response to the test results.		Certain laboratories take the information from soil testing and use the data to recommend fertilization approaches based on both the test results and the target crop. In this sense, the opportunity exists for the providing customized fertilization recommendations in response to the test results.

	In addition to composition, contamination is a concern as well. For instance, the presence of pathogens in irrigation water can lead to contaminated food products. In the case of one outbreak of E. coli in Europe, the ultimate culprit appeared to be the provider of sprout seed from Egypt, not the water or any other later stage activity. The USDA has initiated a Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) program to assist farms with reducing the risk of contamination of food due to such things as irrigation water contamination.		In addition to composition, contamination is a concern as well. For instance, the presence of pathogens in irrigation water can lead to contaminated food products. In the case of one outbreak of E. coli in Europe, the ultimate culprit appeared to be the provider of sprout seed from Egypt, not the water or any other later stage activity<ref>[http://www.producenews.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=32602:costco-ups-testing-for-fresh-produce-beef&catid=43:featured&Itemid=41 Murphy, J. Costco ups testing for fresh produce, beef.]</ref>. The USDA has initiated a Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) program to assist farms with reducing the risk of contamination of food due to such things as irrigation water contamination.

	In the case of either soil or feed, and to a much lesser extent water (unless one is discussing sludge as fertilizer), complexity of the matrix, and the potential for invalid results is significant. In some early LIMS designed specifically for application in soil testing laboratories, elaborate cross checks between various test results were utilized to look for inconsistencies. Clearly, this will drive a different approach to the design of the LIMS than when much simpler final results are required with little interaction between completely different tests.		In the case of either soil or feed, and to a much lesser extent water (unless one is discussing sludge as fertilizer), complexity of the matrix, and the potential for invalid results is significant. In some early LIMS designed specifically for application in soil testing laboratories, elaborate cross checks between various test results were utilized to look for inconsistencies. Clearly, this will drive a different approach to the design of the LIMS than when much simpler final results are required with little interaction between completely different tests.

Jleecbd at 00:56, 4 March 2012

2012-03-04T00:56:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:56, 4 March 2012
Line 101:		Line 101:

	==References==		==References==
			{{reflist}}